sciscape Publications
← All publications

A constant drift reduces the summed spin prediction error for selected 2022–2026 EXO 2030+375 data at brightness power 6/7

We test whether a fit to the 2021 giant outburst of EXO 2030+375 predicts later spin changes. We use public Fermi/GBM frequencies and Swift/BAT rates. We fit integrated brightness at power 6/7 on MJD 59400–59600. We then test 154 pairs in 14 groups from February 2022 to October 2026. The model with zero constant drift predicts a summed change of 63.79 microhertz. The measured change is 52.00 microhertz. A constant drift, fitted on the same training data, changes the prediction to 52.31 microhertz. The group root mean square error falls from 1.95 to 0.73 microhertz. The error for individual pairs stays near 0.33 microhertz. These results apply to 426 covered days at detected pulse epochs. The first test group supplies 73% of the primary prediction. Planned changes to power, smoothing, and gap cuts give measured-to-predicted ratios of 0.777–0.970 without drift and 0.953–1.047 with drift. The summed error thus depends on the empirical model. It does not establish a new physical torque state. We preserve the source snapshots, a duplicate-row audit, all pair selections, code, figures, and added error checks.

EXO 2030+375 · accreting pulsar · Fermi GBM · Swift BAT · spin frequency · prediction · reproducible analysis

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

8
  1. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2135

    This study measured the 2021 brightness and spin-up relation. It supplies a prior exponent for a planned control.

  2. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad614

    This study analyzed the 2021 outburst with Insight-HXMT and torque models.

  3. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348594

    This study measured changes in the spectrum and pulse profile with luminosity. These changes limit a physical use of the BAT rate.

  4. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc573

    This study measured changes in outburst timing after the 2021 event. The present study tests spin changes over later measured intervals.

  5. usesdoi:10.1086/587134

    The GBM FITS source identifies orbital Fit 2 from this work. We use its period for a planned nuisance control.

  6. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab855c

    The GBM pulsar program supplies the public frequency measurements used here.

  7. usesdoi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/14

    The BAT transient monitor supplies the public daily count rates used here.

  8. Symmetric Gaussian fits place two 2026 X-ray pulse centers of EXO 2030+375 near periastron sci:sha256:9bf80669aca59495c0b4fc5ccde460bd6dd8069921241db7d78f00dc4a3329ca

    This related SCI study measures the times of two 2026 outbursts. It helped identify the source for a different prediction test. We do not reuse its code or fitted peak times.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.