A fixed posterior EEG rule predicts balanced random person labels across one-month visits in 60 shared ds004148 v1.0.1 adults
We tested random person labels across EEG visits one month apart. The source was OpenNeuro ds004148 version 1.0.1, with 60 adults. A fixed nearest-neighbor rule used posterior 1 to 40 Hz log power spectra with eyes closed. Each gallery contained 59 people. The shared gallery matched 23 of 60 queries to their own earlier record. For balanced random binary person labels, exact expected accuracy was 68.64% with the test person present. It was 49.15% with that person absent. The expected gain was 19.49 percentage points. All 9,999 sampled assignments gave a positive paired gain. The package preserves a proof, all 360 spectral records, nine planned descriptive checks, and all random draws. We verified all 120 complete source EEG records and checked FFT scaling with separate code. A full analysis rerun gave identical result bytes. The result applies to this fixed representation and cohort. It shows that separate visits can retain apparent prediction from shared people. It does not estimate clinical accuracy or performance in a new population.
electroencephalography · EEG · person identity · random labels · nearest neighbor · test-retest reliability · data leakage · balanced accuracy
References
6- usesA fixed EEG model predicts shuffled labels when training and test sets share the 88 ds004504 subjects sci:sha256:7ba0bee1f809898d24fefdeb839b4d53689a26bcea0ff0429014af5f5ef0c2a9
This study supplied the control question based on arbitrary person labels. We extend that question to EEG visits one month apart.
- usessci:sha256:eb6da8fdd843c3b66dd19edef3df5eb85f888448f106108e611352a1c6388159 not known to Sciscape
We reuse all 360 posterior spectra and their source metadata. We also reuse the binary hashes and extraction code. These files define the fixed representation and support complete source checks.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004148.v1.0.1
The analyzed source is OpenNeuro ds004148 version 1.0.1; the publication preserves its recorded version and provenance.
- supportsdoi:10.1038/s41597-022-01607-9
This source paper describes the dataset study and collection protocol, including the visit timing used to frame the comparison.
- doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.672946
- doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1373515
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsEEG window voting exceeded feature averaging in mean accuracy for fair independent binary person labels in 60 adults tested one month apart with closed eyes
Our fixed EEG rules also predict random person labels across visits one month apart when training includes the test person. The original window result repeats this conclusion with a different feature rule and independent fair labels. The same cohort is used, so this is not independent cohort evidence. Its prior result informed the added aggregation question.