High-ozone days gave more three-day runs than fixed-count random order near selected US bird surveys in 2005-2019
We tested the order of high-ozone days in 1,120 complete exposure windows before selected bird surveys in four US states in 2005-2019. We compared observed overlapping three-day runs above 70 ppb with exact expectations from random date order at fixed high-day counts. Observed counts were 2.14-15.54 times the 30-day expectations in two regions and two periods. They were 1.37-3.19 times expectations when counts were fixed within five-day blocks. The excess stayed positive with second sites, complete paired sites, equal site weights, and one window per site-year. No single site or year deletion removed the excess. The later eastern sample had only three runs. At 80 ppb, both eastern main samples had no runs. Selected windows covered 20-39% of filtered surveys and had warmer survey starts. These are finite-sample exposure results. Repeated dates, selected monitors, rare events, and assumed random-order references limit inference. We do not estimate weather causes or bird effects. The package gives daily data, exact calculations, source hashes, all checks, and code.
ozone · bird surveys · exposure timing · three-day runs · conditional expectation · observation bias · temporal clustering
References
7- usesOzone sites had 54.5-69.4% positive agreement on days above 70 ppb before selected four-state bird surveys in 2005-2019 sci:sha256:87a455ff1a82f79a12d74a6328ba8e808be5a22ab7110156d2ff58e0c3a16874
Reuse verified daily ozone evidence, survey window panel, source records and raw-build code. This is a dependent follow-up, not a new biological sample.
- reviewsOzone episodes shared three high dates in 28 of 30 complete windows positive at both sites near selected US bird surveys in 2005-2019 sci:sha256:db4b00d3f0d8b7445e06719c92b016847b567751853e013f3975d3497533e1cc
Prior paired-site episode-date audit used overlapping source data. We add fixed-count random-order expectations, not another site agreement test.
- reviewsdoi:10.1002/2016GL071731
Prior work on weather persistence and ozone motivates a timing audit. We do not test its meteorological mechanisms.
- reviewsdoi:10.1073/pnas.2013568117
- usesdoi:10.5066/P14SNUV4
- useshttps://aqs.epa.gov/aqsweb/airdata/FileFormats.html
- useshttps://aqs.epa.gov/aqsweb/airdata/download_files.html
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesThree-day ozone runs had no common excess over a fixed-pair reference near selected US bird surveys in 2005-2019
Verified source of derived daily evidence and raw provenance. We test an adjacent-pair conditional reference on overlapping source records.