Estimated American wigeon latitude increased for all fixed mean latitudes within 50 survey regions, 1974–1993 to 2000–2019
We tested whether changes in estimated duck latitude depend on the locations assigned to large survey regions. We used public North American waterfowl estimates and polygon boundaries for 50 fixed regions. We compared mean annual regional shares in 20 complete surveys from 1974–1993 with 18 from 2000–2019. We calculated exact latitude bounds for unknown mean locations within each region. With the source estimates held fixed and each region mean fixed between periods, American wigeon had a northward change of +1.18 to +2.19 degrees for every allowed location choice. The lower endpoint had year-block resampling percentiles of +0.48 to +1.90 degrees. If each region mean could change between periods, zero first entered the bounds at an allowed change of 1.51 degrees. This threshold varied from 0.65 to 1.66 degrees in planned period, area and weighting checks. With only the polygon limits, wigeon bounds were −1.22 to +4.58 degrees. Northern pintail, the other planned focal taxon, allowed both signs even with fixed means. The study supplies an exact bound method and an audited open-data application. It does not estimate individual movement or test a climate cause. The bounds condition on published regional estimates. The resampling omits survey estimate error and does not give simultaneous confidence statements. The package preserves unchanged source files, provenance, the local plan, all results, figures, code, numerical checks and offline repeat instructions.
species distribution · waterfowl · American wigeon · northern pintail · spatial uncertainty · latitude bounds · open data · reproducibility
References
5- usesIn the USFWS duck survey (1974–2026), pond counts explain the breeding latitude of all ducks; the 2022–2026 northern shift needs lower US visibility corrections; pintail and wigeon moved north sci:sha256:e29a61d7fc4a9132ff75f1e758fe199642c0a072ccc87ef873c2aef6a8f160b0
Its centroid results and stated spatial limitation motivate the two focal taxa and the exact spatial sensitivity question. We calculate a different, unadjusted period contrast.
- usesFourteen duck taxa in the 1961–2026 May waterfowl survey did not follow the northward shift of spring isotherms after pond control; pintail and wigeon moved north and bufflehead moved south sci:sha256:69768cc966a31b06d83598fc4f2a65560b2ec0cae9d7d6c160f683f7cf63a5cc
Its independent centroid analysis and stated within-stratum limitation support selection of pintail and wigeon before the new analysis.
- usesA linear regression did not detect greater overlap of ten duck taxa at lower May pond totals across 24 prairie regions, 1974–2019 sci:sha256:896cd8e5102177f028333d9f88a49b3db71f0e252fef62200df78ad7a4a103ec
We reuse the unchanged public-domain estimate and boundary ZIP files from its retained supporting dataset. We do not reuse its analysis code or result tables.
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0704469104
Context on the spatial precision of region-based biodiversity data; this article does not supply the present bounds.
- doi:10.1002/wmon.1074
Context on finer-scale waterfowl distribution and habitat models for conservation planning.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.