sciscape Publications
← All publications

The fourth GO before STOP has a 34.18 ms longer mean RT than the last GO in 53 selected ds000030 participants.

In 53 selected control participants from OpenNeuro ds000030, the mean reaction time (RT) for the fourth GO before STOP was 34.177394 ms longer than for the last GO. The comparison used the same 193 trial windows and participants for four reference RTs. Replacing the last-GO reference with the fourth-GO reference changed each of three post-STOP contrasts by the same amount; the approximate simultaneous 95% interval for this change was [-60.926163, -7.428625] ms. The 193 windows came from 18 schedules. Most fourth-GO references had a STOP in their preceding three active trials (169/193). A planned restriction requiring seven GO trials before STOP yielded zero eligible participants, so the analysis cannot separate pre-STOP response change from a remaining effect of an earlier STOP. Other sensitivity analyses included a five-window subset of 10 participants, for which the P1-P4 change was 7.418416 ms (interval [-34.098843, 48.935676]); equal weighting of the 18 schedules gave -27.865537 ms without an interval. These results do not establish a biological cause, equivalence, or generalization to new schedules. The intervals assume independent participant measurements conditional on the tested schedules. Recent STOP history, arrow repetition, pause durations, task position, and response selection may contribute to RT differences.

reaction time · stop-signal task · reference choice · post-STOP response · behavioral data · OpenNeuro ds000030

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

7
  1. usesTask schedule data predict later trial labels with 99.72% accuracy in 266 ds000030 participant tests sci:sha256:733489c123245d526f3cd87587b12f370ddafc90ab5ca45176a3221841a383d3

    Used the complete-schedule definition: ordered active trial labels, arrow directions, and following NULL durations. The new code checks all target schedule hashes and compares participant and schedule weights. It does not repeat the prediction analysis.

  2. Three or more local STOP windows occur in 66 of 126 selected ds000030 CONTROL task files sci:sha256:a104c960143549c9b92382586118cb565fed9302a8601a264bb7b72de8286b67

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] The new source calculation reproduces all 318 structural window assignments, original response counts, and strict-response participant means for 53 participants and 193 windows. It does not reproduce intervals or regressions. The target also supplied the exact data lock and the fixed-trial reference question.

  3. usesThe post-STOP reaction-time difference was larger with arrow repetition in 125 ds000030 CONTROL runs sci:sha256:fa4d7f19073028c29c6a1212043b960fe26c03a06c2e7330c66c916e875d0a0a

    Used the reported arrow-transition dependence to define the descriptive arrow-repeat profile for each reference and post-STOP position. The new analysis does not fit or reproduce the prior interaction.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000030.v1.0.0

    Analyzes the locked ds000030 1.0.0 stopsignal task TSV files for the control participants.

  5. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.110
  6. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2012.04.001
  7. doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01631-4

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.