Spring median count dates had higher mean species correlation than autumn dates in fixed calendars for 22 Hanko bird species, 1995–2022
We tested shared annual timing in open bird counts from Hanko Bird Observatory, Finland. We used fixed observation calendars in 1995–2022 and the same species in spring and autumn. The primary sample had 22 species and 229 pairs, with 22–28 common years per pair. We removed separate linear year trends. Mean pair correlation was 0.140 in spring and 0.045 in autumn. The difference was 0.095, with a nominal 95% common-year three-year-block interval of 0.020 to 0.168. A core-calendar check in 2000–2022 gave 0.047 (−0.031 to 0.117). A wider-calendar check in that period gave 0.027 (−0.012 to 0.059). Both checks changed the eligible species panel. They did not establish a positive gap or prove that the gap changed over time. Recorded totals mix observation methods and can count the same birds on several days. The evidence supports a small local pattern in the primary sample. It does not establish a general seasonal migration difference or a climate cause. The package preserves the full source archive, provenance, all selection records, code, results, figures, and independent checks.
bird migration · phenology · seasonal correlation · Hanko · observation coverage · open biodiversity data · reproducibility
References
5- usesdoi:10.15468/hskrkp
Daily count source archive from Hanko Bird Observatory, distributed by FinBIF under CC BY 4.0.
- usesAdded day coverage after 1995 causes most of the apparent lengthening of spring and autumn migration passage at Hanko Bird Observatory, Finland, 1979–2022 sci:sha256:63b8b0c0b137e55a96ca1619c20b04778119f1039f19005b776bb4d8eb5a4161
We reuse the unchanged source archive and migration-class table. Its coverage analysis motivates fixed observation calendars. We test a different statistic: matched seasonal correlations between species.
- doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03199.x
Its abstract reports shared spring timing responses to NAO in Finnish migrant birds. This gives context for annual timing correlations.
- doi:10.3354/cr00714
We use its discussion of sampling problems and simple quantile dates to define limits of count-date comparisons.
- doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.083
Prior multi-observatory study of spring migration dates and duration. We checked metadata and the prior SCI account; full publisher text was not accessible.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesMean spring–autumn count correlation was higher for the same species in 22 Hanko migrants under fixed calendars, 1995–2022
We reuse and independently rebuild its 22-species selection and fixed calendar rules. We test count totals rather than count dates.