For fixed sounds, mean acoustic transfer gains were positive in SEEG and two fMRI studies; the test for every class failed
We tested whether an acoustic response model predicts differences among sounds in a class absent from neural training. Separate public studies supplied signed SEEG field means and BOLD fMRI. Four patients and four MRI adults supplied development. A local code lock preceded new scores in 21 patients, 16 B2021 adults and eight NH2015 adults. At ridge penalty 10, mean gains were 0.02807, 0.07546 and 0.07354 source within-class variance units. Their 95% person Student limits were [0.00952,0.04662], [0.06956,0.08136] and [0.06130,0.08579]. The fixed average rule also required an electrical advantage over a pre-event control. It passed two-claim Holm correction, p=0.004971. The fixed test for every class failed, p=0.917961. In 999 full sound refits with person resampling, the electrical range was [-0.00220,0.04917]. Thus the fixed-library person result did not confirm robust transfer over both new people and new sounds. An added regional comparison favored early over association parcels in all 38 people with both panels; it is exploratory. An added exact gain-curve tool found no confidence-supported common positive scale interval for all classes. Independent solvers rebuilt all 265 person-class fits, and original chunks rebuilt all 110682 electrical window values. Separate cohorts and libraries, clinical sampling, source screens, unequal filters and feature builds limit scope. No shared neural cause was established. The package supplies code, permitted inputs, source pins and terms, all results, figures and repeat steps.
auditory cortex · SEEG · fMRI · acoustic transfer · sound classes · prediction · negative result
References
14- usesFor fixed auditory tables, exact sampling risks favored a common estimate over means from four sounds per class in 19 of 21 iEEG patients and 0 of 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:5b3b54f0d4bf50ac1f36128274260927775a891d21ead0ce7498d18c5dbdd751
Supplies licensed compact inputs, source pins, crosswalks and the MIT MRI reader.
- Tests with one sound class left out did not confirm shared gains from seven loudness terms in 21 iEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:d3d02aa730feca9c77f9ebc0c5c88e457777e864d0d5152f5c506e02391bd485
Earlier omitted-class feature tests in reused cohorts; reported exploratory rich-model skill. This work is not independent cohort confirmation.
- Tests on excluded sound classes did not confirm shared gains from four spectral terms in 16 iEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults sci:sha256:33772b879638abb827ec7a3eeedb900c4a2030b0cad51d45c57700e3ba2d7790
Earlier class-centered acoustic prediction benchmark and source of related prior evidence.
- At 20 calibration sounds, mean class gains over acoustic neighbors were larger in association than early auditory parcels in 14 iEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults sci:sha256:ff51441a87d6dd1f0c2567c840e07fbb6d344674d061956664d946ef0266b5be
Earlier regional class-example prediction result; informs interpretation of the different acoustic-detail task.
- usesTwo fixed acoustic rules did not confirm shared nonvoice prediction gains in 18 SEEG patients and two fMRI groups sci:sha256:f6ade96a55abd5dd6909603449b3d63ad197279407aa009d924a3be21ddc98ae
Attributed MRI acoustic measurements inherited through the verified donor.
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.07.063
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.20599001
- doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
- doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
- doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.069
- doi:10.1109/TAFFC.2015.2457417
- doi:10.1145/1873951.1874246
- doi:10.7554/eLife.82566
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.