sciscape Publications
← All publications

The estimated spin state difference in OAO 1657−415's scaled orbital profile changes sign with 2–4 orbit blocks after 2021

We compare the orbital profile of OAO 1657−415 during spin loss and spin gain. We scale each interval by its own brightness. We use public Fermi GBM frequencies and Swift BAT daily 15–50 keV rates saved on 22 October 2026 UTC. Fixed three-orbit blocks define the spin state from a frequency slope. Each block gives a ratio between two rate means. The first covers orbital phases near 0.2 and 0.8. The second covers the central orbit. The principal sample starts after 2021. Its 16 accepted blocks span April 2022 to December 2025: nine show loss and seven show gain. The difference of mean ratios, loss minus gain, is −0.079. We resample runs of adjacent calendar blocks, including gaps. The 95% intervals are [−0.291, 0.152], [−0.288, 0.102], and [−0.256, 0.079] for runs of about 94, 188, and 376 days. All include zero. Two- and four-orbit blocks instead give differences of +0.091 and +0.022. A phase shift of −0.02 cycles gives intervals below zero. The main phase and a positive shift do not. The measured difference depends on the tested time blocks and phase assignment. This does not show that a physical profile change is absent. The result also depends on detected pulses, the public timing solution, daily phase averages, and sparse joint coverage. The package supplies frozen inputs, provenance, code, all attempted blocks, controls, and figures. A separate calculation checks all 86 accepted primary blocks in the earlier and later samples.

OAO 1657-415 · X-ray binaries · orbital profile · torque reversal · Fermi GBM · Swift BAT · reproducible astronomy

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

5
  1. usesGBM data show net spin-up of OAO 1657−415 in 2025 between net spin-down in 2024 and the sampled part of 2026 sci:sha256:ffa9d2a009edbca66f262310f5d5f178f5f91bee24492e3d686ab9a588d807d6

    This report identified repeated GBM measurements and sparse recent BAT coverage. We use its data quality checks and study a different statistic: the orbital band ratio within fixed blocks.

  2. usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stab3561

    This study reported torque-dependent orbital profiles. We use its orbital model and the phases of interest. Our fixed-block daily-rate estimator and later sample differ from its test.

  3. usesdoi:10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/124

    This study measured the orbital decay used in the phase model.

  4. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab855c

    This paper describes the GBM pulse data used here.

  5. usesdoi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/14

    This paper describes the Swift BAT transient monitor data used here.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.