Upper midpoint tails had a larger two-week recurrence contrast at Seattle under two baselines in 1960-2025
We compared upper and lower daily water-level midpoint tails at six US gauges in 1960-2025. The recurrence contrast is the repeat probability at 13-16 days minus that at 6-9 days. After year-month median removal, the upper-minus-lower contrast was 23.44 percentage points at Seattle and 10.26 at San Francisco. Conditional intervals adjusted for six sites were 20.03 to 26.39 and 6.11 to 14.77 points. An annual and seasonal baseline gave 18.74 points at Seattle, with an interval of 14.88 to 22.36. It left the San Francisco difference uncertain. The other four primary site intervals included zero. The Seattle difference stayed positive at 90th and 99th percentile thresholds and with one- and five-year blocks. This extends campaign work on upper tails and next-day persistence. The daily midpoint retains tide variation and is not measured surge. Baseline choice, selected gauges, fixed thresholds, overlapping prior data, and dependence assumptions limit inference.
water level · tail asymmetry · recurrence · daily midpoint · NOAA CO-OPS · tide gauge
References
6- reviewsA 13.66-day fit explained 34% and 45% of later daily midpoint variance at San Francisco and Seattle in 1993-2025 sci:sha256:3332303d7a22d2acccbad882f56b54a002e6e300bbc3d70348c6a15e0cfc17b7
We extend its upper-tail and lunar-period diagnostics to a paired upper-versus-lower recurrence test.
- reviewsLow midpoint tails had more next-day persistence at San Francisco and Seattle in retained 1996-2024 records sci:sha256:88a8ecb586b2acb27ff62bbbd8efc45653101e22429526bdfdd12ece705f92b7
We test a longer lag scale after its next-day tail asymmetry result, on overlapping source data.
- reviewsDaily range supplies most of the mean high-water anomaly on the highest 1% of days at Boston and San Francisco in retained 1960-2025 records sci:sha256:6e3a42bf26d53a74e73ece48e0ad60bfd4788f163515b02d14ca449bbb77d5aa
Its decomposition explains why the daily midpoint does not isolate storm surge.
- doi:10.5194/nhess-20-783-2020
- useshttps://api.tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/api/prod/responseHelp.html
- useshttps://api.tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/api/prod/
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsTail repeat probability differences changed sign between one and five days at Boston and Seattle in retained 1960-2025 records
Prior campaign work on overlapping NOAA records informed this extension.