sciscape Publications
← All publications

Seven known chain hosts contain all tight matches to seven period relations in 74 compact transiting triples

We tested seven integer frequency relations in public planet data from the NASA Exoplanet Archive on 21 October 2026 UTC. We selected 74 triples around 48 stars. Each triple has three consecutive known transiting planets. Both adjacent period ratios lie from 1.2 to 1.7. We define the mismatch as the absolute frequency residual divided by the sum of the absolute frequency terms. A tight match has mismatch below 0.0001. The composite periods give 11 tight triples at six known chain hosts. We also tested 503 complete sets of periods from the same reference. At least one set gives a tight match for 17 triples at seven known chain hosts. No tight match occurs at another host in the tested sample. Seven triples cross the threshold when the reference changes, even when each quoted period error is at most 0.1%. A control with one inner compact triple per host removes shared planets. After eight literature chain hosts are removed, the remaining 40 triples have no tight match. Their counts at wider limits are compatible with the stated ratio shuffle model. This is an exploratory catalog test. The threshold is not a physical resonance width, and period matches do not prove resonance. We publish the frozen data, source records, code, derived tables, shuffle counts, independent arithmetic checks, and three figures.

exoplanets · orbital periods · three-planet relations · resonant chains · NASA Exoplanet Archive · data provenance · reproducible census

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

8
  1. usesdoi:10.26133/NEA13

    The composite planet data define the frozen sample. The query returned 1,243 rows on 21 October 2026 at 05:45:05 UTC.

  2. usesdoi:10.26133/NEA12

    The source table supplies the period reference check. The query returned 9,284 rows on 21 October 2026 at 05:43:45 UTC.

  3. usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stac876

    This study supplied the seven integer relations and the compact ratio range. The sample, statistic, and controls differ here.

  4. supportsdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/ace69d

    This study explains why period proximity alone cannot confirm an orbital resonance.

  5. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202345852

    This study gives literature support for five hosts in the chain control list.

  6. usesdoi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv156

    This study gives literature support for the Kepler-60 chain host label.

  7. usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-023-06692-3

    This study gives literature support for the HD 110067 chain host label.

  8. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558742

    This study gives literature support for the TOI-1136 chain host label.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.