Four SEEG pairs gave 56.7% mean balanced accuracy for cued response labels in later trials from eight participants with known response times
We tested cued left or right button response labels in public SEEG data from eight participants. Models were trained on earlier trials and tested on later trials. Four contact pairs were selected with training data only. The 0.5 s before each known response gave 56.7% mean balanced accuracy. The descriptive 95% participant interval was 52.0 to 64.2%. The planned test gave p = 0.002 with 999 label shuffles. The median was 53.0%. One participant reached 80.9%. The before-cue control reached 55.6%. The evidence did not establish a gain specific to the response window. A task-only baseline reached 50.1%. The package preserves 1,997 trials of derived features, code, exact source versions, byte-range hashes, models, predictions, null scores, and five figures. Response timing was supplied. This study does not establish online control, transfer to new sessions, or brain stimulation.
stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · brain-computer interface · balanced accuracy · response classification · electrophysiology · permutation test
References
2- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.1
The study analyzed public SEEG recordings from OpenNeuro ds004473, version 1.0.1.
- doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAdded SEEG before a response gave no clear key prediction gain over earlier SEEG and task history with a linear reader in eight recordings
Prior key prediction and earlier-window results motivated the earlier-input control. The known high score for person 2 motivated the planned descriptive exclusion. Our probability-loss test, history inputs, group penalties, and trial split differ.
- usesSelection for key identity had lower mean later key error than activity selection in eight offline SEEG records with tuned readers
The prior result showed strong key decoding in person 2. It led us to fix a check that omits this person before we fitted readers.