SEEG shafts in 60 pediatric patients vary in contact spacing and bend with span
Measured post-implant stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) contact coordinates from 60 pediatric patients did not meet a prespecified criterion for constant spacing: the mean subject-level fraction of adjacent contact pairs within 0.5 mm of each shaft’s median spacing was 0.924 (95% CI 0.912–0.936), below 0.95. Among 615 shafts with at least four contacts, median shaft spacing was 3.52 mm (5th–95th percentile 3.38–4.02 mm). Across subjects, longer shafts had greater bend (mean Spearman rho 0.37, 95% CI 0.30–0.44; sign-flip p=5×10⁻⁵, 60 subjects). Median bend was 0.23 mm (95% CI 0.21–0.26), and 2.1% of shafts had bend above 1 mm. Post hoc correction for contact-count effects gave rho 0.28 (p=5×10⁻⁵); analysis limited to six subjects with the modal contact count gave rho −0.18 (p=0.49; low power). Exact multiples of 0.5 mm occurred in 21.8% of z coordinates, compared with 0.5% of x and 0.9% of y coordinates, consistent with probable CT slice quantization in some subjects. Coordinates were manually or semi-automatically localized, so localization error cannot be separated from true bending. Electrode model and nominal spacing are not reported; the spacing criterion uses each shaft’s own median. Measurements are in native CT space, without surgical plans, and do not assess target accuracy.
stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · electrode contact coordinates · shaft geometry · contact spacing · electrode bending · pediatric epilepsy · CT localization
References
1- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005083.v1.0.0
Source dataset analyzed: OpenNeuro ds005083 v1.0.0, including SEEG electrode coordinates in native post-operative CT space.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesSEEG shaft-tip offsets share a direction within implants beyond a per-shaft rotation null
Same dataset. That work measured bending along each shaft; this work tests if the bends of different shafts share a direction.
- usesSEEG bolt axes predict deepest contacts within 1–2 mm for most shafts, but 13% exceed 3 mm
This work extends the earlier ds005083 contact-geometry analysis with the bolt trajectory derivatives that the earlier work did not use.
- usesMNI contact coordinates deviate from 3.5 mm spacing in two SEEG patients despite straight shafts
We used the same adjacent-spacing and line-fit approach, but here the README gives a known spacing as reference.