sciscape Publications
← All publications

A sine model leaves less scatter than a delay model for 267 TIC 71396049 eclipse times with Gaia and TRES data

We test light travel delay as the cause of eclipse timing changes in TIC 71396049, a source already reported as a triple. We fit six public TESS QLP sectors with seven choices of flux, baseline, and eclipse width. The main fit gives 267 eclipse times. At the nominal 49.45206-day Gaia DR3 orbit, a delay model with a free signed amplitude leaves a residual root mean square of 1.056 minutes. A free sine leaves 0.877 minutes. An orbit fit with a Gaussian Gaia constraint reduces the delay residual to 0.886 minutes at 49.38421 days. This timing-only curve fails two further tests under the stated assumptions. Four published TRES radial velocities leave 16.2 km/s of scatter about it after a free velocity offset. At the nominal Gaia RV amplitude, its timing scale requires an RV-star mass of at least 5.53 solar masses if the RV star is the tertiary and all timing change is delay. The published single-star mass estimate is 1.329 solar masses. Joint fits use the Gaia covariance, the four TRES velocities, a fixed timing scatter of 0.9 minutes, and extra RV scatter of 0.1, 0.5, or 1.0 km/s. Free-amplitude delay models then leave 1.012 to 1.035 minutes of timing scatter. Sine models leave 0.878 minutes. At the fixed published mass, delay models leave 1.035 to 1.046 minutes. Thus, the tested delay fits retain excess scatter when the independent velocities and the mass scale are used. These conditional fits do not give a formal rejection probability. Dynamical timing and changing eclipse shape remain possible causes. We release the event times, frozen data, code, figures, and checks. No new planet or unique timing mechanism is established.

TIC 71396049 · Gaia DR3 · TESS · eclipse timing · hierarchical triple · light travel time · orbit covariance · reproducible data

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

10
  1. usesThree of 33 entries in a frozen TESS table lack notes on large period differences with Gaia DR3 SB1 solutions sci:sha256:19bf92b682bb9f65d553d455ba98e3c6f92c495ccd349fa730a2966d3a83e37b

    We use six frozen QLP products, the inner ephemeris table, and parent timing values for a comparison. We fit new event times and test delay models.

  2. doi:10.33232/001c.172274

    This paper already reports the source as a triple and gives the visible-star mass estimate used in the conditional amplitude test.

  3. usesdoi:10.22002/0jxb3-ny611

    We use four TRES radial velocities and the visible-star mass from version 1. Three original CSV tables and byte-range retrieval records are preserved.

  4. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450600

    We use the Gaia SB1 orbit convention and covariance parameter order.

  5. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    We use one Gaia DR3 SB1 row and its reported errors.

  6. usesdoi:10.17909/t9-r086-e880

    The six input light curves are public TESS QLP products.

  7. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ac2ef0

    QLP extended-mission product method.

  8. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4365/ade2d8

    The parent SCI table preserves the catalogue inner-binary ephemeris used to locate eclipse windows.

  9. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2530

    Dynamical timing terms provide a physical limit on a pure delay interpretation.

  10. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf5e4

    Prior compact-object candidate context for this source.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.