Other trial colors increased mean report log density across loads 2, 4, and 6 in 59 ds008037 v1.0.1 test adults under fixed fits with two kernel widths
We tested whether other trial colors improve predictions of color reports in OpenNeuro ds008037 version 1.0.1. All 117 adults with color files met the selection rule. They supplied 33,299 valid reports at loads 2, 4, and 6. We fit models on 58 people and scored 59 other people. The primary reference used two target error widths and a uniform component. The added model used the same kernel around the other trial colors. The mean gain was 0.003724 nats per report, with a 95% person bootstrap interval of 0.000109 to 0.006504. People and loads had equal weight. The interval holds the training fits and stored trials fixed and assumes independent test people. The load 2 interval included zero. Of 59 test people, 41 had a positive mean gain. The gain stayed positive with one kernel width, reversed training and test sets, and removal of the inspected person. True trial arrays also gave higher scores than arrays from other trials in a descriptive control. The result gives a small prediction gain under the stated models. It does not identify a memory process or a swap rate. The package preserves source files, fixed URLs and hashes, the local plan, code, split IDs, fits, report scores, bootstrap draws, figures, and instructions. A fresh download reproduced all 10 core result files byte for byte. Separate calculations confirmed every test density and array-control score. Related AutoSci work uses the same cohort, so it is not independent replication.
working memory · visual working memory · color report · prediction · non-target information · circular statistics
References
7- supportsExcess non-target color alignment increased by 2.09 percentage points from two to six items in 117 ds008037 v1.0.1 adults under fixed angle rules and a control based on other trials sci:sha256:641e12a4b03c59a96c984dc1c30b909da95a04dfd35c3d80b630c2a5c8abea75
The present report prediction gain agrees with this publication's evidence for trial-specific non-target color information under a different score. We read that report after our fits and did not change the analysis. Both reports use the same cohort. This is not independent replication.
- usesWith circular error scores, mean error had a higher Pearson correlation across color and orientation tasks than load cost in 115 selected ds008037 v1.0.1 adults sci:sha256:e8a3c7eca943ddf09e69ed38dffea5bc790ab7bdb6f33273e4f847dbd4286ba0
This publication supplied the initial unchanged color task files, source tree, tag records, and hashes. We read its report and inspected one source table before our local plan. We then verified all used files by fresh retrieval. We did not use its analysis code or person scores.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds008037.v1.0.1
The analyzed color task files are from OpenNeuro ds008037 version 1.0.1.
- doi:10.64898/2026.07.12.738085
- doi:10.1162/imag_a_00349
- doi:10.1038/srep19203
- doi:10.1007/s42113-022-00150-5
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesThe 95% color shift gain interval included zero in 59 ds008037 v1.0.1 test adults under fixed fits with two kernel widths
This report supplied the source tables, pinned source manifest, and participant split. Its model with other trial colors is our reference model. We fit both models anew and add a trial-specific sine shift.
- usesA fixed ridge test did not show lower sine error loss from previous report angles in 59 ds008037 v1.0.1 adults
Its current-trial non-target prediction result motivated the current non-target controls in our fixed base model. We wrote new analysis code and tested a different endpoint.