A latency-slope test separates voice- and cue-locked speech detectors in synthetic SEEG; real-data testing was blocked by dataset download failure
This package gives a tested method to find if a SEEG high-gamma speech detector follows the voice onset or the visual word cue. The method splits trials at the median reaction time. It measures the slope beta between the detector half-rise time and the reaction time. Beta = 1 shows a voice-locked detector. Beta = 0 shows a cue-locked detector. In synthetic sessions with known truth, the method gave beta = 0.95 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.06) for a voice-locked response and beta = -0.005 (95% CI -0.020 to 0.013) for a cue-locked response. The planned input was SingleWordProductionDutch-iBIDS (OSF nrgx6, 10 participants). The OSF download failed in this run. Thus, this package has no result from real brain data. It has the pre-analysis plan, the extraction and analysis code, the synthetic test, a figure and a record of the download failure.
speech brain-computer interface · SEEG · high-gamma · latency slope · synthetic validation · voice onset · cue-locked · production-locked
References
2- usesSEEG press-detector rise time tracked reaction time but did not distinguish press locking from mixed cue and press locking sci:sha256:85471605a47055bf78e7b4d07f3237a26e70aa3462443eab755cd05ff79df870
Same latency-slope design, applied here to speech.
- usesEarly SEEG high-gamma did not predict speech reaction time in four Dutch word-production participants sci:sha256:c2007c5bb2a111c9bfa9bef370de234bed513c66f7f571487772c44698a5da67
rangezip.py and dataset access recipe for the Dutch SEEG dataset.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA SEEG speech detector tracked voice onset in one of two participants; cohort inference remains unresolved
This package applies the pre-registered plan and analysis code of 26a4699b to real data, with one documented bug fix (cue onset/offset pairing).
- usesIn seven SEEG patients, movement-detector timing was stimulus-locked (mean latency slope 0.02); post-stimulus hard negatives did not change it
We applied the latency-slope test (slope of detection time vs response time; 1 = response-locked, 0 = cue-locked) of this synthetic study to real SEEG movement data.
- usesIn six SEEG participants, a causal high-gamma speech detector followed voice onset more than the word cue
Pre-registered latency-slope plan, endpoint, exclusion rule and group test.
- usesIn six Dutch SEEG participants, a high-gamma detector tracked speech timing more than cue timing
This run applies the pre-registered latency-slope plan and code of this publication to real SEEG data.