SST models fitted to 1984–2013 predict kelp canopy in central and southern California and Washington in 2017–2025, but northern California canopy stayed at 9% of prediction
Question: does sea surface temperature (SST) alone predict floating kelp canopy loss in the 2014-2016 northeast Pacific heatwave and the recovery after it? Data: Santa Barbara Coastal LTER Landsat kelp canopy (30 m pixels, quarterly, 1984 to mid-2026, Baja California Sur to Washington) and NOAA OISST v2.1 monthly SST. Method: we grouped pixels into coastal segments of about 25 km in 7 latitude regions and used log annual maximum canopy. We fitted segment models with region-specific SST anomaly slopes on 1984-2013 only, selected the model by leave-one-year-out cross-validation, and then compared observed with predicted canopy for 2014-2025. Years were the units of inference. Results (64 segments): in northern California (37.8-42 N, bull kelp), canopy in 2017-2025 was 9.4% of the SST prediction (log residual -2.37, year bootstrap 95% interval -2.65 to -2.03), below all 22 nine-year windows of 1984-2013 cross-validated residuals; all 4 segments were below their own 5th percentile. In northern Baja California, canopy followed the model in 2017-2019 but fell to 7% of prediction in 2023-2025, below all training windows. In southern and central California and Washington, 2017-2025 residuals (-0.13, -0.06, +0.02) were inside training variation. In 2014-2016, giant kelp regions lost less canopy than the model predicted, but northern California lost more. Five sensitivity analyses (segment filter, pixel coverage, July-September canopy) gave the same conclusions for these regions. Oregon and Baja California Sur had one segment each, and their results were not robust. Limitations: SST is a proxy and the model explains little year-to-year variation; nutrients, waves and grazers are not in the model, so the study shows where canopy departs from temperature control but not the cause.
giant kelp · bull kelp · Macrocystis pyrifera · Nereocystis luetkeana · marine heatwave · Landsat · sea surface temperature · OISST · recovery · hysteresis · California Current · out-of-sample prediction · regime shift
References
7- usesdoi:10.6073/pasta/8d67f78530eadd77aefd85e66f5643de
Landsat kelp canopy area data (SBC LTER knb-lter-sbc.74.34), the primary data of this study.
- usesdoi:10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0166.1
NOAA OISST v2.1 sea surface temperature used for the predictors.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0271477
Kelpwatch study of regional heatwave response and recovery with the same Landsat product to 2021; our results extend and agree for northern California.
- doi:10.1038/s41598-019-51114-y
Northern California bull kelp shift to urchin barrens after the heatwave.
- doi:10.1038/s42003-021-01827-6
Kelp forest ecosystem shift with sea star epizootic and heatwave in northern California.
- doi:10.1111/1365-2745.70072
Drivers of bull kelp refugia in northern California; grazing became the main control after 2019.
- doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00413
Resistance and resilience of giant kelp in southern and Baja California to the heatwave.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Landsat kelp canopy in 2017–2025 stayed below a 1984–2013 SST and wave model in northern California (7%) and northern Baja (31%), and by total area in central California (53%), but not in Washington
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Independent study of the same question. We reproduce its northern California and northern Baja deficits with different aggregation, season, wave predictors and uncertainty method. For central California we agree with equal cell weights but find a deficit in total canopy area (ratio 0.53), concentrated at the Monterey Peninsula and Big Sur.
- Independent re-analysis: Landsat kelp canopy in northern California and northern Baja California stayed at 20% of a 1984–2013 temperature model in 2021–2026; wave height did not explain it
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Same question (SST model fitted to 1984-2013, kelp canopy 2014-2025) with a different, independent design; this study reproduces its northern California, northern Baja California and Washington results and adds a wave term, a mainland-island split and 2026 data.
- Annual kelp canopy changes showed no clear mean synchrony shift at 34 coastal cells between 2002–2013 and 2014–2025
Related canopy recovery analysis of the same Landsat record.