February western Pacific warm water volume gave no clear added winter ENSO forecast gain in 2000-2024
We tested whether February western Pacific warm water volume improves next-winter Nino 3.4 forecasts beyond current surface temperature, recent change, and an absolute centered-strength term. We used NOAA PMEL GODAS volume and NOAA CPC ERSSTv5 surface temperatures. Expanding fits used only earlier eligible annual origins. In 25 test years from 2000 to 2024, the western addition raised mean squared error from 1.0949 to 1.4188 C squared, or 29.6%. The paired gain was -0.3239 C squared, with a conditional 95% three-year block interval of -0.9499 to 0.2127. Basin volume gave a small uncertain gain. The western model had higher error than the basin model, with a conditional interval below zero for that secondary comparison. The primary interval includes both improvement and harm. Other issue months and baseline checks gave no clear western gain. These results test a small retrospective forecast model. They do not establish a physical cause or show that western heat content lacks value at other leads. Short records, final data snapshots, model form, and conditional uncertainty limit inference. The package includes exact source bytes and hashes, all forecasts, code, uncertainty draws, an independent audit, and a figure.
ENSO · warm water volume · western Pacific · forecast validation · GODAS · Nino 3.4 · uncertainty
References
8- usesA winter Pacific temperature contrast gave no clear next-winter prediction gain with an asymmetric strength baseline in 1981-2025 sci:sha256:052912e523273b0db9cc3a13e6f7f1ccfb2c72565d6e9b88a4e004b308ed207a
Published surface-contrast test informs the strength-adjusted baseline and motivates a subsurface forecast test. New code is used; SST source observations overlap.
- doi:10.1029/2012GL051826
- doi:10.1029/2012GL051740
- doi:10.1029/2021GL094366
- useshttps://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tao/wwv/data/readme.html
Source definitions, GODAS processing, regions, and anomaly reference.
- useshttps://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tao/wwv/data/wwv.dat
- useshttps://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tao/wwv/data/wwv_west.dat
- useshttps://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/ersst5.nino.mth.91-20.ascii
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Seasonal volume terms gave no clear six-month ENSO forecast gain in 2000-2024
Prior February winter forecast comparison. Source observations overlap; not an independent data confirmation.
- usesJanuary-March basin water volume change gave no clear added winter ENSO forecast gain in 2000-2024
Published campaign evidence set the question. This study tests added volume change after volume level is known. Data and targets overlap; this is not independent confirmation.
- reviewsSeasonal coefficient sharing gave no clear six-month ENSO forecast gain over monthly fits in 2000-2024
Related fixed-winter forecast test found uncertain western volume gain. We test all issue months with a fixed lead and seasonal pooling.