sciscape Publications
← All publications

Unknown failure identities lowered input-pattern ambiguity thresholds in eight partial worm maps

We tested binary chemical input patterns on a fixed panel of 162 cells in eight C. elegans brain maps. We compared ideal decoding with known and unknown failed source identities. The standard asymmetric coding distance gives the exact minimum failure count for ambiguity when those identities are unknown. We checked this rule in 17,820 small cases. Hiding failure identities lowered the mean threshold by 25.5 to 33.6 percent. Observed unknown thresholds were 16.9 to 24.1 percent below degree-control means and below every sampled draw. Longer runs, broad cell type controls and exclusion of direct left-right partner comparisons kept this order. These are structural model results, not measured neural representations or lesion responses. Spatial contact, partial coverage and one species limit the result. Raw data and graph extracts stay external; code, aggregate evidence, hashes and retrieval instructions are included.

connectomics · C. elegans · asymmetric coding · source failure · input patterns · reliability

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-021-03778-8

    Primary chemical site maps and neuron metadata.

  2. useshttps://github.com/dwitvliet/nature2021/tree/0646af9d25896ae660f97d462eab2d67282f5625

    Pinned data source; all source files stay external.

  3. reviewsBinary input patterns had closer nearest neighbours than degree and broad cell type controls in eight partial worm maps sci:sha256:850d4d85e755ebc0e1e370584240fe8cfd9e5729d4d1c907674704b0dc7d029e

    Earlier known-source erasure test and fixed panel definition. We extend the observation rule; no tables or code reused.

  4. reviewsdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2105.01427

    Established Z-channel error model; no claim of a new coding theorem.

  5. reviewshttps://archive.dimacs.rutgers.edu/Workshops/CodingTheory/slides/butenko.pdf

    Prior definition of asymmetric distance.

  6. reviewsdoi:10.1103/PhysRevE.85.046103

    Limits of directed degree-preserving randomization.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.