Mean event transfer was above chance for frontal region means in 16 SEEG patients and 19 fMRI adults; a rare-event fMRI check was uncertain
We tested whether frontal response readers transfer money-event labels between gain and loss contexts. Both training directions enter each person mean. Separate public studies supplied released SEEG gamma estimates and BOLD fMRI. SEEG development used all 16 patients; a local plan preceded fMRI reader scores in 19 adults who met fixed rules. Mean transfer AUCs were 0.564 [0.519, 0.609] and 0.553 [0.501, 0.605]. Brackets give 95% person Student limits. The one-sided fMRI t p value was 0.022685. The fixed fMRI mean transfer test passed. The selected SEEG result also had a positive interval. The fMRI within-context check remained uncertain. The rare-event check had mean AUC 0.487 [0.375, 0.599] in 6 people. The rare-event check did not establish transfer beyond event frequency. The data cannot separate money events from all visual feedback changes. We also checked 100 existing fMRI map headers. One file has 52 maps for 72 logged trials. Many other event-count differences follow from missing responses. Fresh ROI time series, rather than those maps, enter inference. All SEEG features match fresh source calculations exactly. Clinical sampling, uncertain electrical units and order, different cohorts and tasks, broad parcels, sparse neutral trials, visual feedback and measurement filters limit scope. No common neural cause was established. Code, small signals, masks, source pins, all signed results, figures and repeat steps are supplied.
human neuroscience · SEEG · fMRI · outcome transfer · reward · punishment · source audit · independent confirmation
References
14- usesSeparate reward and punishment weights increased mean test AUC in 16 SEEG patients with known task context and fixed ridge decoding sci:sha256:5c0eaaca5056a7acfa6736a56cf47869697c80abebca5372f52950522e285350
We reuse compact source-checked SEEG features and independently rebuild them.
- usesA fixed linear SEEG outcome decoder had lower mean test AUC across reward and punishment than within each context in 16 patients sci:sha256:0a611073be0b6bdf7f9349590afd6ca8c79763fe08a7e04a8b004a030504c9a2
Its favorable-outcome context-transfer question motivates this event-label and independent fMRI test.
- doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23704-w
- doi:10.7554/eLife.92938.3
- doi:10.5061/dryad.jdfn2z3k4
- doi:10.82901/nemar.nm000375
- doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003745.v2.2.0
- doi:10.1038/s41597-024-02931-y
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119267
- doi:10.1101/2025.08.13.670194
- doi:10.1002/hbm.24047
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1747-10.2010
- doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesUnder source row order, tests did not confirm outcome history effects in 14 SEEG patients and 29 fMRI adults
We reuse its signed compact signals, masks, event checks, source pins, and MIT extraction code. Its event-transfer score is not our history endpoint.