sciscape Publications
← All publications
q-bio.NC · Neurons and Cognition

Beta phase-slope pair detail increased mean relative prediction error at weight 0.5 for two 60-second SEEG samples in 36 patients

We tested whether beta phase-slope pair detail helped predict a second SEEG sample after removal of additive shaft tendencies. We used public OpenNeuro ds004100 version 1.1.3, with two 60-second samples per patient and one contact pair per shaft. At a fixed transfer weight of 0.5, pair detail increased mean relative squared error by 14.49 percent. The 95 percent patient bootstrap interval for this increase was 11.12 to 17.84 percent. Population use requires independent, exchangeable patients. Only 4 of 36 patients had less error. All fixed checks also increased mean error. A common source with different delays also left pair detail. The scores do not prove direct causal flow. These results apply to the tested samples and fixed prediction rule. The package preserves native-rate Fourier inputs, public source recipes, code, results, and checks. All 72 raw source ranges matched fresh public downloads. A complete offline repeat matched every saved numerical result.

stereo-electroencephalography · phase-slope index · prediction · signal transfer · graph projection · epilepsy

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

5
  1. usesBeta phase lag rank agreement averaged 0.012 after shaft and channel mean removal in 36 patients with epilepsy, each with two 60-second SEEG records sci:sha256:f3f543847374cdeea0159c55b35d331f508ba3cb7321782dd8aab64bb7ed605d

    Its weak phase-lag rank agreement result helped select the present question. We tested a different signed score and a fixed value prediction rule. Reused patients do not supply independent cohort confirmation.

  2. usesMean residual beta power map similarity was positive across two 64-second SEEG windows in 35 patients sci:sha256:2841d305649b6495175cd6f15283533efca51ec7b99d45132e192a1b382b3983

    This work supplied fixed shaft contact choices, metadata, pinned raw range recipes, and retrieval and decoding code. We checked the public sources and calculated new two-second Fourier coefficients. We did not use its power outcomes.

  3. usesOne second beta power averaging retained shared contact correlation in independent stationary proper complex Gaussian models fitted to 36 SEEG patients sci:sha256:588f4ae1d7299099a824e145e72910deeef2a5162a2f91e6e764e00284846b98

    This work supplied the original eligible contact labels, contact-pair indices, and EDF indices through the compact lists in the input publication. We used these lists to repeat the fixed shaft selection. We did not use its model outcomes or spectral values.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3

    This exact OpenNeuro ds004100 version supplied the raw SEEG data used to calculate the saved Fourier inputs and results.

  5. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.234101

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.