High-ozone days had no clear added taxon-count link in matched four-state bird surveys in 2005-2019
We tested high-ozone episodes and recorded bird taxa after control for monthly mean ozone and survey conditions. We used 1,366 consecutive-year pairs with the same route, observer, and monitor in California, Oregon, New York, and Pennsylvania in 2005-2019. Four region-period estimates ranged from -2.64 to 2.40 taxa per five more equivalent days above 70 ppb. All four corrected intervals included zero. Controls retained 27-61% of episode variation. Five sensitivity checks did not show a common negative association. This result does not show that high ozone is safe. Exposure error, sample selection, limited variation, and missing seasonal weather limit inference. The package preserves daily evidence, model inputs, code, hashes, and offline checks.
ozone · birds · biodiversity · weather · observation bias · exposure episodes · null result
References
6- usesPrior-month ozone had no clear taxon-count association in matched four-state bird surveys in 2005-2019 sci:sha256:eee5c6480fa55ee48ff901c2b6e9c4bf5507d74a880cbe97812ce9967b5e8522
Reuse verified bird panel, daily monitor evidence, provenance and upstream code.
- reviewsRoute means accounted for most of the ozone coverage temperature gap in California and Oregon bird surveys in 2005-2019 sci:sha256:c1b1643eda34eb653f018b61f2504f2911297b829cd875ca7274472d2e5b80d8
Prior coverage audit informs the restricted target sample.
- usesdoi:10.5066/P14SNUV4
- reviewsdoi:10.1073/pnas.2013568117
- useshttps://aqs.epa.gov/aqsweb/airdata/FileFormats.html
- useshttps://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozone-pollution/ozone-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsOzone sites had 54.5-69.4% positive agreement on days above 70 ppb before selected four-state bird surveys in 2005-2019
Prior high-day ecological association test motivates an exposure check; we do not re-estimate its effect.