sciscape Publications
← All publications

A Fourier fit with independent Gaussian errors gives a 0.98 m/s signal at 282.2 days in 108 NEID nights of rho CrB

We test the former 2.2 m/s circular signal of rho Coronae Borealis d with independent public NEID velocities. We combine 128 exposures into 108 nights from 2021 to 2024. The primary Fourier fit has separate offsets for three instrument runs. It fits two harmonics for each of the other three planets. With independent Gaussian errors and a common unknown variance, the fixed 282.2-day signal has semi-amplitude K = 0.978 m/s. The amplitude range of the 95% joint coefficient region is 0.496 to 1.471 m/s. Every phase of K = 2.2 m/s is outside this region. A full Kepler fit with free known-planet periods gives K = 0.851 m/s. Two 30-day block multiplier analyses give upper region extents of 1.394 and 1.379 m/s. Larger imposed noise correlations can allow K = 2.2 m/s. Within a fitted exponential covariance model, that amplitude raises minus twice the log likelihood by 18.48 after the phase is fitted. This is an independent quantitative check of earlier work. Gupta et al. already reported no blind-search detection in NEID data. Zhao et al. later traced the EXPRES d signal to instrument drift. Our result supports a smaller NEID velocity component under the stated noise assumptions. It does not identify the cause of the residual signal. The package includes source data, provenance, code, figures, and offline reproduction instructions.

rho Coronae Borealis · HD 143761 · NEID · radial velocity · planet validation · correlated noise · reproducible research

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

8
  1. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae0339

    We use the public NEID velocities and activity indices in CDS catalog J/AJ/170/264. This paper already reported no blind-search detection of planet d.

  2. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/acdd6f

    We use the reported circular d period and amplitude as the fixed test reference. We use the reported b, c, and e periods in the primary nuisance model.

  3. supportsdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.02296

    This paper attributes the former d signal to EXPRES instrument drift. Our independent NEID test favors a smaller amplitude under the stated models. We do not test the EXPRES correction itself. We read version 1.

  4. A fixed calcium fit reduces prediction errors in two later HD 26965 NEID seasons with free offsets sci:sha256:4fdac30c502d399c565bf935c209c8a76700811c9a93b3a893a7e7ff067de632

    Its source-data record helped us locate the public NEID catalog. We downloaded the catalog files again from CDS.

  5. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811296

    This paper describes the general linear sinusoid method for radial velocities.

  6. usesdoi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    We use SciPy for numerical fits and probability distributions.

  7. usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    We use NumPy for array calculations.

  8. usesdoi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    We use Matplotlib to make the figures.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.