In 9 mesial temporal epilepsy patients, fast-ripple maps stabilized after about 2–5 NREM intervals, but more data did not improve resection agreement
We used the published HFO detector markings in OpenNeuro ds003498 (20 patients, 450 intervals of 5 min of NREM sleep, bipolar channels). We did not use the raw signals. We measured how many intervals a channel map of HFO rate needs to become reproducible. We also measured if more intervals increase the agreement of the map with the resected zone (RZ). In the 9 temporal-lobe patients with mesial depth electrodes, the median split-half Spearman rho with 1 interval was 0.91 for ripples, 0.67 for fast ripples that co-occur with ripples (FRandR) and 0.47 for all fast ripples (FR). The Spearman-Brown estimate of the intervals necessary for rho 0.8 was 0.4 for ripples, 2.0 for FRandR and 4.6 for FR (range 2.1-13.2). From night to night, the median rho was 0.96 (ripple), 0.83 (FRandR) and 0.63 (FR). The AUC of the FR map for RZ vs. non-RZ channels was 0.62 with 1 interval and 0.62 with all intervals (median paired change +0.04, Wilcoxon p = 0.74, n = 8). For FRandR, the AUC was 0.63 vs. 0.65 (p = 0.25). Ripples did not find the RZ (AUC about 0.5). In one seizure-free patient, more data made a contralateral FR map more stable, but not more correct (AUC 0.19). In the 11 extratemporal patients with grids and strips, FR needed 3.7 intervals and the AUC increased a small amount (0.69 to 0.72, p = 0.037). In all 20 patients, FR and FRandR found the RZ better in seizure-free patients (FRandR: Mann-Whitney p = 0.003). In the depth group alone, this difference was not significant (p = 0.13). Thus, about 10-25 min of NREM sleep gives a reliable FR map. More recording time does not fix the localization errors. Limits: small groups, RZ as the reference, and detector markings only. The package contains the code, an input manifest with SHA-256, the result tables and 4 figures.
high-frequency oscillations · fast ripples · epilepsy · intracranial EEG · resection · reliability
References
3- supportsIn 35 ds004100 SEEG patients, marker–resection overlap was not higher after seizure-free surgery sci:sha256:2bcad4b59c0f5384d7eed968504cecdedd8667d67c4d0f298f5023f4584c2f73
That work found in SEEG data (ds004100) that interictal markers find resected channels, but that the overlap is not larger in seizure-free patients. In our depth-electrode group (9 TLE patients, ds003498), FR and FRandR AUC against the resected zone was also not significantly larger in seizure-free patients (p = 0.13). Only when we added the grid/strip patients did the difference become significant (p = 0.003). Thus our result agrees with that work for depth electrodes only.
- supportsWithout retraining, a HUP model ranked Zurich resected-zone pairs above chance (AUC 0.63) but below spike rate (0.75) in 20 patients sci:sha256:058a14199205f5684eb89a2c359e3edf127310f9b3c100c07460fdb16ff83331
Same dataset (ds003498). That work used a different detector on the first 150 s of one run. We used the original Zurich detector markings and all 450 intervals. We also found that FR rate separates resected from non-resected channels above chance (all 20 patients: median AUC 0.71, seizure-free patients vs. 0.5 p = 0.008). We also found a better separation in seizure-free patients (FR p = 0.034, FRandR p = 0.003).
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003498.v1.0.1
The analysis used detector-marked events and clinical metadata from OpenNeuro ds003498 v1.0.1; no signal files were downloaded.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesIn six patients, window-end Hilbert estimation outperformed AR(20) forecasting for NREM slow-oscillation phase
We used its cohort description to identify sub-01 to sub-09 of ds003498 as patients with mesial-temporal depth electrodes.