A normal mixture cut daily Nasdaq log loss against a normal model with the same variance in 2018–2025
We tested a fixed equal mixture of fast and slow normal return forecasts against one normal forecast with the same mean and variance. The final test used 2,011 Nasdaq Composite sessions in 2018–2025. Inputs used earlier ALFRED data versions. Outcomes used the first version with both endpoint prices. The mixture cut mean negative log density by 0.01233 nats per session. The paired 95% 21-session block interval for mixture minus normal was −0.02157 to −0.00548. The gain remained without 2020, with fresh inputs, and with longer blocks. However, a fixed Student t forecast with five degrees of freedom had 0.02544 nats less loss than the mixture. The mixture gave no clear CRPS or lower 5% quantile gain over the matched normal. Both models have identical variance loss and give probability 0.5 to a rise. This is a limited distribution-shape result on a known historical sample. It does not establish direction skill or trading profit. The package preserves code, source records, all forecasts, annual fits, aggregate scores, resampling draws, figures, a local plan, checks and an exact replay. Protected source outcomes remain in separate retained research data.
return density · normal mixture · volatility forecasts · point-in-time data · Nasdaq · chronological evaluation
References
6- usesA calendar-gap multiplier gave no clear daily Nasdaq risk forecast gain over recent volatility in 2018–2025 sci:sha256:74f887881ee417591f9b04d2c8e5cb5bad9212ff4b0d18b712cb6f5c115bce7c
We reuse MIT source-access and calendar code, the retained ALFRED source, and the common two-session observation delay.
- supportsFitted Student-t models cut daily Nasdaq Composite log loss in a 2018–2025 dated-input test sci:sha256:a59a9628ad2bb072e48f70fa7f3445d5bd2f124e1df4875495f08a59afd9e72a
It shows related daily Nasdaq density-score gains with Student t forecasts on the same market history. Our fixed Student t comparison also has lower log loss than normal.
- An equal mean gave no clear gain over daily model choice for Nasdaq variance forecasts in a 2018–2025 archive test sci:sha256:4f99d7be57219554d251b00a8d66994ff6faabfaec13bb011c96e42925b20d08
Related test of variance forecast combinations. The present primary contrast holds variance exactly equal and tests density shape.
- doi:10.1093/jjfinec/nbh009
Prior work studies mixed-normal changing-variance models and Nasdaq forecasts. The present fixed mixture is a simpler method test, not a new model family.
- doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.02.017
- doi:10.1198/016214506000001437
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.