May–October ground-beetle catches showed no clear mean gain in similarity of species shares across seven UK sites in 1994–2013
We tested whether ground-beetle catches became more similar between fixed UK Environmental Change Network sites. We compared qualifying years in 1994–2003 and 2004–2013. The main sample has 115 named species, 15 transects, 231 complete transect-years and seven sites. We adjusted catches for monthly trap effort and used all named species in the selected panel. Mean Bray–Curtis distance between site species shares fell from 0.794 to 0.763. The change was −0.031, with a 95% site-and-year resampling interval of −0.125 to +0.077. Thus, the data do not establish a mean gain in similarity across these sites. The mean change within sites was larger: the distance between period profiles was 0.268. Effort, quality, season, annual weight and dominant-species checks gave changes from −0.010 to −0.031; all site-and-year intervals included zero. With sites fixed, a secondary year-only interval depended on the year-block choice. A fixed-total sampling benchmark also shows why occurrence and species-share measures can give different signs. Pitfall catches measure activity and density together. The sites are not a random UK sample, and missing years differ between transects. We preserve original source data, provenance, code, all estimates, figures and a clean reproduction check.
Carabidae · ground beetles · Environmental Change Network · species composition · spatial similarity · biotic homogenization · pitfall traps · survey effort · reproducibility
References
6- usesdoi:10.5285/8385f864-dd41-410f-b248-028f923cb281
Original ECN ground-beetle counts, trap dates, quality records and species dictionary.
- usesMean catch dates for common ground beetles showed no clear change at seven UK ECN sites between 1994–2003 and 2004–2013 sci:sha256:63b4a8083529ba05fdce46933248f0a3f4f4f98d7463b3257defc08de9aba577
We reuse its source and monthly effort parser under MIT terms. We calculate new spatial distances.
- The 1994–2008 site and habitat trends of UK ECN carabid beetles did not continue in 2009–2015; later indices moved back toward the earlier mean at 11 site units sci:sha256:9892f06981b0d9fa541d2eef2efe3a50247b1bec561051805433f20562519f96
Prior test of ECN abundance-trend persistence and provenance for retained source files.
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02194.x
Earlier ground-beetle abundance trends in the ECN network motivate a separate test of spatial similarity.
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01572.x
Defines spatial homogenization and the need to distinguish occurrence and abundance measures.
- doi:10.7554/elife.78521
Context from another insect survey that found turnover and spatial homogenization. Our data concern a different method, habitat and region.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.