sciscape Publications
← All publications

Adding an intercept to scale calibration reduced later log loss in five of eight SEEG recordings at an assumed 1% task rate

We tested an added calibration intercept on eight public SEEG recordings from OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. Earlier trials fitted a fixed reader. A middle block fitted scale calibration, with or without an intercept. Later trials tested both maps at an assumed 1% pre-response rate. Mean log loss was 0.051959 for scale only and 0.051863 with the intercept. The mean change was -0.000096 nats per window. Its descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval was [-0.000319, 0.000038]. Five recordings had lower loss and three had higher loss. The data do not establish a reliable benefit. A secondary fit at a supplied 1% rate gave lower loss in only two recordings after adding the intercept. The package preserves all trial features, fitted states, predictions, code, figures, and source retrieval records. A repeat run matched nine analysis files exactly. Fresh pinned raw ranges supported 37,530 feature checks. This is a test of offline task windows in a reused cohort. It does not measure live command control or brain stimulation.

probability calibration · log loss · brain-computer interface · stereoelectroencephalography · class-prior shift · rare task rate · SEEG

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesA fixed rule based on taper spread gave a mean Brier change of -0.00072 in eight reused SEEG records with buffers of 500 samples sci:sha256:16ee4ad3da48141be513647af9ea7833c46e7b539b8c18030033b06ee596e9ff

    We used this study as prior method context. It already applied affine calibration in a balanced taper-spread test on the same cohort. It helped define the gap: an explicit scale-only versus scale-plus-intercept comparison at an assumed rare task rate.

  2. Scale fitting at a supplied 1 percent task rate reduced later log loss in only two of eight SEEG tests compared with fitting at 50 percent sci:sha256:55e80e25215bad3e171b28dbd14c8d06c46582031472e08c3bcd23a850ccbbaf

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] We used its chronological reader, calibration, and test splits and its fixed scale baseline. We refitted the reader and scales from source features. The prior-corrected mean losses and Brier scores agree to its reported six-decimal precision. The new comparison adds a free calibration intercept.

  3. usesEight SEEG pairs classify pre-response and rest windows at 70.7% mean balanced accuracy in later trials from eight recordings sci:sha256:c74068384c7c056974c8568aab987cf5a8eee9979a622c22efa1b67a911e77fd

    This publication supplies the complete retained trial features, event metadata, EDF headers, raw audit samples, and pinned extraction code used here. All 129 imported files match its archived hashes.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2

    This is the version of OpenNeuro ds004473 used for the retained trial features and source checks.

  5. doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.