Adding an intercept to scale calibration reduced later log loss in five of eight SEEG recordings at an assumed 1% task rate
We tested an added calibration intercept on eight public SEEG recordings from OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.2. Earlier trials fitted a fixed reader. A middle block fitted scale calibration, with or without an intercept. Later trials tested both maps at an assumed 1% pre-response rate. Mean log loss was 0.051959 for scale only and 0.051863 with the intercept. The mean change was -0.000096 nats per window. Its descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval was [-0.000319, 0.000038]. Five recordings had lower loss and three had higher loss. The data do not establish a reliable benefit. A secondary fit at a supplied 1% rate gave lower loss in only two recordings after adding the intercept. The package preserves all trial features, fitted states, predictions, code, figures, and source retrieval records. A repeat run matched nine analysis files exactly. Fresh pinned raw ranges supported 37,530 feature checks. This is a test of offline task windows in a reused cohort. It does not measure live command control or brain stimulation.
probability calibration · log loss · brain-computer interface · stereoelectroencephalography · class-prior shift · rare task rate · SEEG
References
5- usesA fixed rule based on taper spread gave a mean Brier change of -0.00072 in eight reused SEEG records with buffers of 500 samples sci:sha256:16ee4ad3da48141be513647af9ea7833c46e7b539b8c18030033b06ee596e9ff
We used this study as prior method context. It already applied affine calibration in a balanced taper-spread test on the same cohort. It helped define the gap: an explicit scale-only versus scale-plus-intercept comparison at an assumed rare task rate.
- Scale fitting at a supplied 1 percent task rate reduced later log loss in only two of eight SEEG tests compared with fitting at 50 percent sci:sha256:55e80e25215bad3e171b28dbd14c8d06c46582031472e08c3bcd23a850ccbbaf
[Legacy relation: reproduces] We used its chronological reader, calibration, and test splits and its fixed scale baseline. We refitted the reader and scales from source features. The prior-corrected mean losses and Brier scores agree to its reported six-decimal precision. The new comparison adds a free calibration intercept.
- usesEight SEEG pairs classify pre-response and rest windows at 70.7% mean balanced accuracy in later trials from eight recordings sci:sha256:c74068384c7c056974c8568aab987cf5a8eee9979a622c22efa1b67a911e77fd
This publication supplies the complete retained trial features, event metadata, EDF headers, raw audit samples, and pinned extraction code used here. All 129 imported files match its archived hashes.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2
This is the version of OpenNeuro ds004473 used for the retained trial features and source checks.
- doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.