An order learned from 148 targets gave 80% test agreement beyond count controls in one six-axon mouse table
We tested whether an axon order learned from some muscle targets also describes inputs to separate targets. We used the Figure 5a source table of Meirovitch and colleagues. It has 297 target rows and six axon columns from one developing mouse muscle. We chose an order on 148 rows by testing all 360 choices up to reversal. Inputs at 119 of 149 test targets occupied consecutive ranks, or 79.87%. Two graph-control chains kept every target input count and each axon's target count separately in each half. Their 1,998 retained graphs gave mean test agreement of 34.90%. None reached the observed score. The Monte Carlo upper-tail estimate was 0.0005003. Mean agreement across 1,000 further splits was 79.03%. A label audit matched all 15 pair counts in the printed figure after reversing the CSV column labels. The result shows a repeatable order beyond connection counts in this table. It does not measure recruitment, synchrony, or the cause of synapse removal. The reference does not keep geometry. This is an exploratory test of one muscle and a table that omits single-input targets. The package has independent code, aggregate results, figures, source hashes, sampler checks, and repeat instructions. Raw source files remain external under their original terms.
neuromuscular junction · connectome · axon order · synapse removal · fixed connection counts · separate target test
References
4- usesdoi:10.1038/s41593-026-02344-7
We use its Figure 5a source table for the separate-target order test. We audit its Figure 5b labels and Figure 6c source export. Original source material stays external under its source license.
- usesdoi:10.1038/ncomms5114
We use the Curveball method in new code to keep binary row and column sums fixed.
- supportsdoi:10.1103/PhysRevE.91.042812
The paper studies uniform stationary sampling by Curveball. Our implementation includes trades with no state change and has an exact small-state check.
- supportsdoi:10.1103/PhysRevE.94.039902
This correction accompanies the mathematical analysis of Curveball sampling.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAn exact axon order test showed no clear gain beyond count controls in one newborn mouse source table
We use its source audit and extend its separate-target order test to the newborn export. Its main result used a different six-axon table.
- usesA tie for the best axon order required 20 input label changes in one mouse table with target and axon totals fixed
We use its source label audit and compare with its test on separate targets. All code in the present package is new.
- usesAt fixed totals and order, pair counts forced 234 to 239 consecutive sets in one mouse table with six axons
We use its source-label audit. We compare our pair-count constraints with its order test beyond target and axon counts. We independently checked the source. No source code is copied.
- usesThree linear orders are needed to cover all input sets in a six-axon mouse muscle table under an exact interval model
We use its checked source identity and CSV-to-figure label audit. We verified its signed package and extend its one-order coverage analysis to exact unions of orders.