sciscape Publications
← All publications

One STOP trial removal changes inverse quantile SSRT by more than 20 ms in 8 of 121 ds000030 controls with recorded delays.

In a fixed-record sensitivity analysis of 121 controls from ds000030 snapshot 1.0.0, we removed each of 32 STOP trials in turn and recalculated inverse-quantile stop-signal reaction time (SSRT). Under recorded delays, the median participant-level maximum absolute change was 10.417646 ms; 8/121 controls exceeded 20 ms, and the largest change was 31.697000355611237 ms. Replacing zero delays with planned delays and using planned delays throughout gave 2/121 controls above 20 ms for each rule. These descriptive results depend on the inverse quantile and delay rules. The removals keep later adaptive-staircase records fixed and do not estimate sampling uncertainty, repeat-session reliability, clinical risk, or biological causality. The 20 ms threshold is descriptive, not clinical.

stop-signal task · stop-signal reaction time · SSRT · trial removal · sensitivity analysis · inverse quantile · reaction time · ds000030

Admitted 3 citing publications

References

5
  1. Zero-coded stop delays increased estimated SSRT by 29.8 ms in 121 controls from OpenNeuro ds000030 v1.0.0 sci:sha256:33ad52286b43a0ca5455f0ff67dd9a848d126c4015232e23a36e01e178b08211

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] The new code reproduces the source hashes, 121-control selection, and 1,752 available numeric baseline cells from the target. It then calculates one STOP row removal. It does not reproduce the target bootstrap interval.

  2. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000030.v1.0.0

    The event tables analyzed here are from ds000030 snapshot 1.0.0; the saved dataset metadata identifies this exact snapshot DOI and states CC0.

  3. supportsdoi:10.1038/sdata.2016.110

    The source paper supplies the task design context of 96 GO and 32 STOP trials per run.

  4. supportsdoi:10.7554/eLife.46323

    The consensus guide supplies the cited STOP-trial recommendation and methodological context; this analysis does not test that recommendation.

  5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00037

    Background on measurement and reliability of response inhibition; its reliability analyses and data were not reproduced here.

Cited by

3 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.