One STOP trial removal changes inverse quantile SSRT by more than 20 ms in 8 of 121 ds000030 controls with recorded delays.
In a fixed-record sensitivity analysis of 121 controls from ds000030 snapshot 1.0.0, we removed each of 32 STOP trials in turn and recalculated inverse-quantile stop-signal reaction time (SSRT). Under recorded delays, the median participant-level maximum absolute change was 10.417646 ms; 8/121 controls exceeded 20 ms, and the largest change was 31.697000355611237 ms. Replacing zero delays with planned delays and using planned delays throughout gave 2/121 controls above 20 ms for each rule. These descriptive results depend on the inverse quantile and delay rules. The removals keep later adaptive-staircase records fixed and do not estimate sampling uncertainty, repeat-session reliability, clinical risk, or biological causality. The 20 ms threshold is descriptive, not clinical.
stop-signal task · stop-signal reaction time · SSRT · trial removal · sensitivity analysis · inverse quantile · reaction time · ds000030
References
5- Zero-coded stop delays increased estimated SSRT by 29.8 ms in 121 controls from OpenNeuro ds000030 v1.0.0 sci:sha256:33ad52286b43a0ca5455f0ff67dd9a848d126c4015232e23a36e01e178b08211
[Legacy relation: reproduces] The new code reproduces the source hashes, 121-control selection, and 1,752 available numeric baseline cells from the target. It then calculates one STOP row removal. It does not reproduce the target bootstrap interval.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000030.v1.0.0
The event tables analyzed here are from ds000030 snapshot 1.0.0; the saved dataset metadata identifies this exact snapshot DOI and states CC0.
- supportsdoi:10.1038/sdata.2016.110
The source paper supplies the task design context of 96 GO and 32 STOP trials per run.
- supportsdoi:10.7554/eLife.46323
The consensus guide supplies the cited STOP-trial recommendation and methodological context; this analysis does not test that recommendation.
- doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00037
Background on measurement and reliability of response inhibition; its reliability analyses and data were not reproduced here.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- 4,856 of 7,260 ds000030 participant pairs keep their SSRT sequence with two delay rules and a maximum of one STOP row removal from each run.
[Legacy relation: reproduces] The new code agrees on the 121-person selection and 16,380 A/B score cells. It compares full-table inverse scores and removal scores for two quantiles. It does not compare all target outputs.
- Two GO rank rules give positive and negative SSRT changes after the same GO row removal in each of 121 ds000030 controls.
[Legacy relation: reproduces] The source subset, manifest, sample rules, and reference tables enable this calculation. New exact code agrees with 378 initial upper-rule scores and 24,192 post-STOP upper/linear scores for 126 controls, under three delay rules. The largest difference is 1.7053025658242404e-13 ms. The same 121-person primary sample and reported threshold counts agree. This relation does not claim reproduction of every target field.
- Removal of one STOP trial gives a zero delay difference in 24 of 84 ds000030 control runs.
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Recalculated all 8,064 STOP-row removal records for the 126 shared runs and two quantile methods. All 104,832 compared cells agree exactly. The 121-run absolute-score maxima and descriptive 20 ms counts agree. The observations are shared.