sciscape Publications
← All publications

Forgotten words that later returned as intrusions had forgotten-like SEEG decoder scores

In an offline analysis of 18 patients in the FR1 delayed free recall task (OpenNeuro ds004789, version 3.1.0, session 0), we tested whether an encoding-period SEEG decoder trained to distinguish recalled from not-recalled words assigned higher scores to forgotten words that later returned as prior-list intrusions (PLIs). The decoder used L2 logistic regression on channel-by-band log-power features from 0–1.6 s after word onset, with leave-one-list-out scoring. For 80 forgotten-then-intruded words, the pooled within-patient AUC against never-intruded forgotten words was 0.520 for raw scores and 0.517 after serial-position control (one-sided p = 0.29; controlled null 95% range 0.438–0.563). A reference using recalled words from the same patient and serial-position bin had mean AUC 0.639 (95% range 0.588–0.689); the observed controlled AUC was below all 1000 reference draws (p = 0.001). Later intrusion did not change scores among recalled words (90 words; controlled AUC 0.491, two-sided p = 0.82). The median recalled-versus-not-recalled decoder AUC was 0.667. These results do not support recalled-like encoding scores for forgotten words that later intruded, but the small sample does not rule out a modest shift: the controlled gap-fraction 95% confidence interval was −0.09 to 0.83. The analysis was offline, included one session per patient, one linear decoder, and one feature set; word-text matching identified PLIs, and encoding and retrieval causes cannot be separated.

SEEG · memory · prior-list intrusion · free recall · encoding · brain-computer interface · logistic regression

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

3
  1. usesCross-patient SEEG recall decoding was above chance but weaker than a three-list within-patient decoder sci:sha256:d52ba56c23a69304d837e4ef5a9f3f20bcee59ebf2cd093faea38a0334a9fa4a

    We use the archived FR1 band-power features and events.tsv text of this package (checksums in results/source_features_MD5SUMS.txt).

  2. supportsThe SEEG word-recall decoder did not predict recall order or latency among recalled words after serial-position control (18 patients, OpenNeuro ds004789 FR1) sci:sha256:69c6034189d49db3d4018a6d6d25aa9fab484c1abd6b69a97d9dd5d431db5c35

    Like cf48ee6a, the encoding decoder score does not follow later recall dynamics; here it also does not follow later prior-list intrusion.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004789.v3.1.0

    The source publication states that the archived FR1 features used in this analysis come from OpenNeuro ds004789 version 3.1.0, session 0.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.