A rest-anchored threshold reduced false-alarm error for HG+beta SEEG detection, but not for HG alone
We tested whether a decision threshold for an SEEG key-press detector keeps its target false-alarm rate (FPR) on later trials. We used archived high-gamma (HG, 70–150 Hz) and beta (13–30 Hz) bipolar features from 8 subjects in OpenNeuro ds004473 v1.0.2. A shrinkage LDA threshold was calibrated on out-of-fold rest scores from trials 1–100 and evaluated on trials 101 onward. At a 10% target, the mean FPR error for HG was −0.019 (exact sign-flip p=0.35), while subject FPRs ranged from 0.00 to 0.157 and mean absolute error was 0.048. At a 5% target, 2 of 8 subjects had more than twice the target FPR. In an exploratory control using random rather than first-100 calibration trials, mean absolute error was 0.041 for HG at a 10% target (p=0.45), consistent with finite calibration-sample noise accounting for much of the error. A running threshold based on the last 50 cued rest scores reduced mean absolute error for HG+beta to 0.022 at a 10% target and 0.018 at a 5% target (p=0.047 for both comparisons); the reduction was not significant for HG alone. TPR did not change significantly (all p>0.4). The study includes 8 subjects, one session each, and one cued task; its windows are trial-locked, and tests were not corrected for multiple comparisons.
SEEG · brain-computer interface · false-alarm rate · threshold calibration · shrinkage LDA · high-gamma · beta band
References
2- usesBeta power increased later-trial SEEG key-press AUC in 6 of 8 subjects sci:sha256:b76113878b22b13b8fce6b4b57cf321bb22ce16b618b55ae02c2ef42b972f816
Uses the archived per-trial HG and beta features and the LDA code. Extends its AUC transfer test to operating-threshold (FPR) transfer.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2
The analysis used archived features derived from OpenNeuro ds004473 v1.0.2.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsIn 15 SEEG patients, a detector with mean AUC 0.83 had mean PPV 0.38 at a simulated 10% movement base rate
Both studies show that a threshold set on training data gives a test false-alarm rate different from its target. Here, in-sample LDA scores gave 2.7 times the target FPR in a different dataset (ds006253).
- usesFor an offline cued SEEG key-press LDA, margin flagged later-trial errors in 8 subjects; Mahalanobis novelty did not improve detection
Same detector and split; that work studied false-alarm thresholds, this work studies error flags and posterior calibration.