At 30 Hz, fitting the strength slope cut squared log error by 16.6% for 438 mouse V1 basket-cell inputs with test dates excluded
We tested whether a fitted first-strength slope improves second-response predictions over a fixed proportional rule with source and target layer controls. We used public mouse V1 input maps at 30 Hz. After source checks, 991 connections remained in 69 maps from 39 dates. We fitted one strength slope per target type. Every test date was absent from fitting. For 438 basket-cell inputs, the fitted slope reduced mean squared log amplitude error by 16.6%. A 95% date resample range with full refitting was 2.2% to 29.6%. Pyramidal and Martinotti cell tests gave no clear gain. The pooled descriptive gain was 1.84%. The basket-cell gains fell to 8.0% and 6.2% at first-amplitude thresholds of 0.2 and 0.5 mV, with ranges that included zero. A second calculation fitted the best common gain within each measured map. It left mean squared vector residuals of 15.9%, 21.2%, and 22.1% for the three target types. These residuals equal readout variance fractions only for the same input pattern, linear addition, and independent equal-variance input components. Noise can cause sublinear slopes and vector differences even when true response gains are constant. The study is exploratory and does not identify a release mechanism. The package gives source data, provenance, code, predictions, full model states, resamples, figures, and repeat instructions.
mouse visual cortex · optomapping · short-term synaptic dynamics · input maps · response prediction · measurement error · linear readout
References
6- usesFor equal input activation, strength weighting lowered 30 Hz gain estimates by 0.13 in 69 mouse V1 input maps sci:sha256:52a91f2ae872b8b907b7e3d7807bcbbbc666694090caaec31677c7d907c28d68
We reuse the source format audit and compare a fresh extraction with its connection table. Its total-gain result differs from the present tests of individual response prediction and vector readout error.
- usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.5x69p8dc7
Source dataset, Dryad version ID 338458, metadata version 4, released 2025-02-08. The exact data ZIP and checksum are preserved.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100735
Source optomapping methods, cell labels, connection maps, and physiological context.
- supportsdoi:10.1038/382807a0
Earlier experiments linked synaptic dynamics to the content of transmitted signals. We do not claim that general principle as new.
- supportsdoi:10.1073/pnas.94.2.719
Earlier theory and recordings established a functional role for short-term synaptic depression.
- supportsdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-24-09608.2001
Explains ratio-related bias and the need to limit mechanistic claims from paired-pulse summaries.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesWith fixed known responses and linear sums, 14 of 36 incomplete mouse V1 maps required more than 5% layer share change at 30 Hz with no upper limit on missing responses
We use its source ratio audit rule and compare our independently extracted known input set with its 991 retained connections. We verified its signed archive.
- Trial adjustment reduced a 30 Hz map score from 1.53% to 0.83% in 76 selected mouse V1 PV outputs
This earlier study measured input-vector changes in a different optical dataset. Its trial-noise limit motivates the present repeated-recording test.
- At 30 Hz, source layer gave no clear added voltage prediction gain after first strength in 991 mouse V1 connections
This related study tested strength slopes within target classes in the same source maps.