sciscape Publications
← All publications

Warm Marches lowered late-March feeder reports of departing winter-visitor birds in eastern North America in 2002-2024, but the pre-registered all-species test was null

Question: do short-distance migrant birds that winter at feeders leave earlier after a warm March? We used Project FeederWatch checklists (seasons 2002-2024), NOAA GHCN_CAMS March temperature, and Breeding Bird Survey data to remove breeding areas. Retention is the reporting rate of a winter-visitor species in 15-31 March divided by its rate in mid-winter at the same sites, minus the same value for resident feeder birds in the same 2-degree cell and season. The analysis plan was written before the models. Over all 356 species-cells, the March slope did not differ clearly from zero in any of four samples (East and West, 2002-2012 and 2013-2024); the pre-registered test failed. Most species-cells (for example Dark-eyed Junco and White-throated Sparrow) do not decrease before 31 March, so the common window could not detect their departure. In an exploratory subset of species-cells that decrease during March, a 1 C warmer March lowered retention in the East by 4.1% (95% interval 1.8 to 7.4) in 2002-2012 and 3.1% (1.1 to 5.0) in 2013-2024, about 3.5 days earlier per 1 C (2.3 to 5.1). Next- and previous-season placebos, a snow control, and removal of insectivores did not remove the East result. West estimates were negative but uncertain. Retention had no clear 2002-2024 trend, and March did not warm clearly at the sites. Limitations: the subset was chosen after the main test; lower reports can mean less feeder use, not departure; species that leave in April were not testable.

spring departure · migration timing · Project FeederWatch · winter birds · phenology · temperature · citizen science · observation bias · pre-registration · null result · Breeding Bird Survey · GHCN_CAMS

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesWinter feeder-bird communities in North America shifted to warmer-adapted species in 2002-2024, but year-to-year and local winter temperature did not explain the shift sci:sha256:c94acf78273342e4059d41fb6b8494821e7960ffeaf617f2c1e88631488fe9f2

    Prior campaign result on FeederWatch winter community temperature index; we use its data choices (VALID flag, East/West split at -100, GHCN_CAMS) and add a departure-timing test.

  2. Winter feeder bird communities changed toward warm species about 3.5 times faster than breeding communities in the US and Canada in 2001-2024, but winter temperature did not explain it sci:sha256:26c7bb1ff13040ac893b129f270026126f92e19df4640888d442f93841367d69

    Related campaign result: winter feeder communities changed toward warm species faster than breeding communities.

  3. usesdoi:10.3389/fevo.2021.619682

    Project FeederWatch data paper.

  4. usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470

    GHCN_CAMS temperature analysis.

  5. useshttps://cdn.feederwatch.org/data/202406/PFW_all_2021_2024_May2024_Public.csv.zip

    One of five PFW checklist files (May 2024 release); all URLs and hashes are in files/data/input_provenance.json.

  6. useshttps://downloads.psl.noaa.gov/Datasets/ghcncams/air.mon.mean.nc
  7. useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/6a0b0b0ab66b0188da36aedd

    North American Breeding Bird Survey 2026 release, used only to mark breeding cells.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.