sciscape Publications
← All publications

At 10 ms per state, opposite gain changes of 10%, 20% and 40% kept decay within 0.1% of baseline in one zebrafish linear model

We tested whether cell gain changes with a time mean of one preserve a model eye-position signal. We used a signed 289-cell core from one partial zebrafish hindbrain connectome. We made 64 balanced gain patterns. Each pattern alternated between opposite 10%, 20% or 40% gain changes. Each state lasted 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 or 100 s. Three model calibrations gave 2,880 tests. At 0.01 s per state, every tested decay rate stayed within 0.1% of its initial value. Longer states changed decay in both directions. The 0.1 s calibration had recurrent eigenvalue 0.99. At 40% amplitude, 49 of 64 pattern pairs had a growing frozen state. Only one pattern grew over complete cycles at 1 s per state. The source article's times for each cell class gave decay in every tested cycle. For one pattern near the median rate effect, motor output reached 2.91 times its initial value. A local second-order calculation links the duration effect to activity outside the initial slow mode. Uniform gain changes gave the exact commuting control. This is a conditional result for assumed periodic gains in a linear model. It does not estimate gain changes, failure rates or eye movements in animals. The package has code, source checksums, all results, figures, a derivation and repeat instructions. Original source matrices remain external.

connectome · neural integrator · gain modulation · periodic dynamics · Floquet exponent · zebrafish · persistent activity · model stability

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesdoi:10.1038/s41593-024-01784-3

    We use the released synapse count matrix, input totals, cell order and cell classes to rebuild the linear model.

  2. usesTwo models of one zebrafish connectome had different stability under nominal 10% gain CV with fixed mean gain and initial 10 s leading decay sci:sha256:daae49ace6fff49295ee19f81507fb70a3ea25dadd4bc202ba32d01c0fc423a1

    We use its pinned source receipt and model rules. We extend its fixed-gain question to periodic, opposite gain states. Its signed package was verified.

  3. doi:10.1038/s41593-025-02080-4

    This earlier work fitted cell gains in connectome-based recurrent models.

  4. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-62839-6

    This earlier work used periodic perturbations and second-order Floquet calculations to study neural model stability.

  5. doi:10.1038/nn.3711

    This earlier study measured response gain variation with temporal structure in visual neurons. It does not set the gain law used here.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.