sciscape Publications
← All publications

Tested sine models show over 96 percent reduction of the 7.5-day amplitude in final QLP data for TIC 12189121 in TESS sector 92

We test how public QLP flux products retain a known brightness wave in TIC 12189121, or Gaia DR3 6772575122655104640. We select this source after an audit of nine QLP light curves for four Gaia binary candidates. Sector 92 version 01 supplies 9,307 common valid points over 25.34 days. A quadratic trend and sine terms at P and P/2 give P = 7.5033 days. The fitted fundamental amplitude falls from 52.164 parts per thousand in SYS_RM_FLUX to 0.342 in DET_FLUX. This is a reduction of 99.34 percent. Twenty-four tests of short-cycle periods and trends give reductions above 99 percent. The star was already in the ATLAS MSINE catalog with a master period of 14.917523 days. Four-harmonic fits at that master period describe alternate cycles better. In these fits, the near 7.5-day second harmonic falls by 96.11 to 96.62 percent. Thus, the exact reduction depends on the waveform model. Independent Gaia epoch data have strong period peaks near 7.4636 days, with sparse sampling aliases. Two background-corrected TESS pixel apertures give periods near 7.48 and 7.49 days. The approximate wave centers lie near the target, but close stars remain unresolved. This case shows that final QLP detrending can hide a large known brightness component. We do not establish a planet, a new variable, a physical mode, or an error in the Gaia short-period velocity orbit. The package contains source data, hashes, requests, analysis code, figures, and repeat instructions.

TESS · QLP · Gaia DR3 · stellar variability · detrending · ATLAS · light curves · reproducible astronomy

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

15
  1. usesCatalog values for 2,668 Gaia DR3 SB1 entries with periods below 10 days fail a detached-star test under a periastron Roche model sci:sha256:8df05a84d11a9aa0d6da7b79e3a0663f5158596f8fd43b84e26fe40637edb9c0

    We reuse its four-row priority selection. We do not repeat its wider catalog test.

  2. Three of 33 entries in a frozen TESS table lack notes on large period differences with Gaia DR3 SB1 solutions sci:sha256:19bf92b682bb9f65d553d455ba98e3c6f92c495ccd349fa730a2966d3a83e37b

    This study supplies method context for comparisons of Gaia and TESS periods. Its three flagged targets differ from ours.

  3. usesdoi:10.17909/t9-r086-e880

    We use QLP version 01 FITS light curves. The main source is TIC 12189121 in sector 92.

  4. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ac2ef0

    This paper describes QLP light curves in the TESS extended mission.

  5. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272

    We use Gaia observations.

  6. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    We use Gaia DR3 catalog values and epoch photometry.

  7. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450600

    This paper describes Gaia DR3 single-lined binary processing and its limits.

  8. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243688

    We quote the Gaia stellar estimates and preserve their source values.

  9. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/aae47f

    ATLAS already identifies the star as an MSINE variable with a master period near 14.92 days.

  10. usesdoi:10.26093/cds/vizier.51560241

    We retain the ATLAS catalog row from VizieR.

  11. usesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.1905.10694

    The TESS Input Catalog supplies the source match.

  12. usesdoi:10.3847/2515-5172/ac74c4

    We use one GSFC ELEANOR-LITE light curve in the supporting four-target audit.

  13. usesdoi:10.17909/t9-wpz1-8s54

    We use one TESS-SPOC light curve in the supporting four-target audit.

  14. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab9cae

    The ZTF catalog supplies context for TIC 222433651. We do not analyze ZTF epochs.

  15. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    Astropy supplies FITS, time-series, and WCS tools.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.