A residual test kept its 5% pair level after common average reference in Gaussian models with known covariance and 88 public EEG power profiles
We tested pair inference after common average reference. The model used 19 independent input channels. The inputs were proper complex Gaussian vectors with a known zero mean. Fixed channel powers came from 88 public EEG records in OpenNeuro ds004504 v1.0.9. At 10 Hz, each generated record had 100 vectors. We generated 5,000 records per profile. A zero-coherence test at a 5% pair level rejected 10.82% of pairs. A residual test that used the known reference covariance rejected 5.00%. Bonferroni graph alarm rates were 29.26% and 4.89%. The proof gives an exact pair level under the stated Gaussian assumptions. All five planned model checks are reported. The package supplies the test tool, proof, fixed powers, spectra, source hashes, seeds, and full results. Three fresh source replays and a full simulation repeat passed. Reference effects and Gaussian residual tests are established methods. This work adds a benchmark with public power profiles and reusable code. It does not measure brain connections. The exact test requires known covariance fixed independently of the tested samples.
common average reference · complex Gaussian model · EEG · exact inference · pairwise coherence · Monte Carlo benchmark · known covariance · Bonferroni correction
References
7- usesThe adjusted theta/alpha EEG contrast remained in 55 selected ds004504 v1.0.9 Alzheimer and control participants after a fitted 6-13 Hz peak moved to 10 Hz with the log spectrum remainder fixed sci:sha256:b459bf4e8797de57fb08602f1c9b3511bba8ea5341390b40a77c7ef89c2758cc
We used all 88 archived channel spectra from OpenNeuro ds004504 v1.0.9 to set the fixed model powers. We preserved its retrieval code and source hash manifest. Three fresh downloads reproduced its spectra exactly.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004504.v1.0.9
The fixed channel power profiles were derived from all 88 processed records in this exact OpenNeuro release.
- doi:10.3390/data8060095
- doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3294618
- doi:10.1007/s11571-026-10464-w
- doi:10.1016/0013-4694(88)90171-x
- doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00941
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesGlobal phase shuffle gave 35.55% rejection under channel isolation after average reference in 88 EEG magnitude models at 10 Hz with shared background phases
Its covariance benchmark and reference argument helped define the new question. This study uses a conditional phase law instead of known Gaussian covariance. It tests error under dependent background phases and provides a one-channel rank test.
- usesPhase randomization after common average reference raised rejection in 88 EEG magnitude profiles with independent uniform phases at 10 Hz
This prior report supplied the reference covariance benchmark and the zero-sum phase constraint argument. It stated that it did not compare full phase-surrogate tests. The present report performs that comparison under fixed observed magnitudes and joint independent input phases.
- usesPhase randomization after common average reference raised rejection in 88 EEG magnitude profiles with independent uniform phases at 10 Hz
This prior report supplied the reference covariance benchmark and the zero-sum phase constraint argument. It stated that it did not compare full phase-surrogate tests. The present report performs that comparison under fixed observed magnitudes and joint independent input phases.