ASASSN-14ko flares in 2023-2025 occur up to 21 days later than the Payne et al. 2022 ephemeris predicts, and the period decrease became slower after 2021
ASASSN-14ko is a nuclear transient in ESO 253-G003 with flares that repeat approximately every 115 d. Payne et al. (2022) published a timing model with a period derivative Pdot = -0.0026, fit to flares up to 2021 November. We tested this model with data that it did not use: ASAS-SN Sky Patrol v2 g-band photometry to 2025 February, our own aperture photometry of 382 Swift/UVOT visits (2020-2026), and TESS full-frame-image photometry, which includes sector 98 (2025 October-November). We measured flare times with several markers (UV peak, optical half-rise, template shift, polynomial peak). We calibrated the offset of each marker on 2018-2021 flares. After 2022 the flares occur later than the published prediction: by +3 to +6 d in 2022-2023, by +6 to +17 d in 2023-2024, and by +21 d in 2025 November (TESS). Three instruments agree. From the Swift-UV-peak and optical-rise markers, the local period decreased by 0.41 +/- 0.09 d per cycle in 2018-2021 but by only 0.12 +/- 0.06 d per cycle in 2021-2025 (z = 2.7, approximate). The mean local period in 2023-2025 is 107.45 +/- 0.32 d. The Payne et al. 2022 model predicts 105.3 d. The strength of the evidence for a change of Pdot depends on the data set. A re-fit of the published 2014-2021 peak times with a free jitter (Pdot = -0.00214) still agrees with the 2022-2025 times (p = 0.26), because its forecast spread is +/- 3-8 d. A re-fit with the Payne et al. error treatment (Pdot = -0.00234) is rejected by the optical-rise times (p = 0.003). Joint fits prefer a change of Pdot near 2021 by Delta BIC = 4.8 to 32. Limitations: we had no ground-based optical data after 2025 February; flare shapes changed in 2022-2023, so the flare markers can shift; our UVOT photometry does not use the HEASoft pipeline. We give forecasts for the 2026-2027 flares (for example, a peak near 2026-11-18 if the 2023-2025 period stays constant, against 2026-10-18 from the Payne et al. 2022 model). These forecasts can be tested directly.
ASASSN-14ko · ESO 253-G003 · repeating nuclear transient · partial tidal disruption event · flare timing · period derivative · ephemeris forecast test · Swift UVOT · TESS · ASAS-SN · out-of-sample test
References
11- uses, challengesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2206.11278
Source of the tested timing model (P0 = 115.2 d, Pdot = -0.0026) and of the 2020-2021 published peak times. Our data show that the flares after 2022 occur later than this model predicts.
- usesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2009.03321
Published 2014-2020 flare peak times (Table 3) used as training data.
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.2104.06414
Earlier Swift study of the 2020 flares of ASASSN-14ko.
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.2310.03236
Reports the change of flare shapes (bumps, rebrightenings) in 2022-2023 that affects the timing markers.
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.15039
Swift monitoring of ASASSN-14ko to 2024; the source of most Swift observations that we re-analyse for timing.
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.2309.15849
Theory of period evolution of repeating nuclear transients (star-disk interaction).
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.2406.03675
Repeating partial tidal disruption models of ASASSN-14ko.
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.04559
Review of repeating partial tidal disruption models; long-term flare evolution.
- usesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2304.03791
ASAS-SN Sky Patrol v2 light curves.
- useshttps://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/FTP/swift/data/obs/
Swift/UVOT level-2 sky images (archive).
- useshttps://registry.opendata.aws/tess/
TESS full-frame-image cubes on AWS used for the pixel cutouts.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.