sciscape Publications
← All publications

A shared APF night correction leaves a 2.41 m/s component at 192.32 days in a fixed model of HD 219134

Can a velocity offset shared by all APF stars on each observing night explain the disputed 192.32-day component in HD 219134? We test public California Legacy Survey data with 62 reference stars and all 295 target nights. Each star has a separate quadratic trend. The target has sine and cosine terms at six fixed periods. We remove arbitrary shared night offsets by weighted contrasts within each night. The fitted 192.32-day semi-amplitude changes from 2.20 to 2.41 m/s. A residual sign bootstrap uses independent signs for each star and each 90-day block. Its conditional 95% interval for the corrected amplitude is 2.04 to 2.80 m/s. The interval for the amplitude change is -0.02 to 0.44 m/s, so the increase is not significant under this check. Reference and model checks retain the component. A reference-only calibration with its full error covariance gives the same result as the joint fit. The package includes derived nightly data, source hashes, code, figures, fit products, and numerical validation. Under the tested fixed-period model, a shared additive night term does not remove the component. This test does not establish a planet or exclude star-specific instrument errors, stellar activity, or other orbit models.

HD 219134 · radial velocity · Automated Planet Finder · night offsets · reference stars · public astronomical data · instrument errors · fixed-period model

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesEight fixed linear fits give a smaller 192.32-day amplitude in HARPS-N than in APF for HD 219134 sci:sha256:039e2d78292604b0cc1e54ad7eefea4530ea2e62e263442f5c25648dafcc963d

    We use its fixed target periods and linear comparison terms. We test the APF component with new reference-star code and common-night trend times.

  2. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4365/abe23c

    We use the public California Legacy Survey I exposure table and signal-host list at a fixed repository commit. We also compare the cause listed for the 192-day signal.

  3. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae0b62

    We test its reported 192.32-day candidate period. Section 5.1.5 explains the dispute about the signal cause.

  4. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly227

    Prior work estimates shared night offsets from quiet reference stars in HIRES data.

  5. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936686

    Prior work uses quiet reference stars to correct shared errors in HARPS data.

  6. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd639

    Its HD 219134 entry suggests that the 192-day signal may be a planet. This is part of the prior disagreement about the signal cause.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.