Spatial and temporal spring slopes gave no stable common difference in four US lilac samples in 1965-2008
We tested whether spatial climate gradients and temporal weather variation gave the same first-bloom spring slope. Four US lilac samples used 9,015 plant-year records from 1965 to 2008. We fit plant and year models, then regressed year-adjusted plant means on local climate. Plants had equal total weight. Spatial-minus-temporal slopes were -2.71, -1.39, +1.79, and +1.91 days per C. The early eastern interval narrowly excluded zero under a working state-plus-year jackknife. Latitude adjustment reduced that gap, and flag removal made its interval include zero. Shorter weather windows reversed both western point contrasts. The results do not establish one common spatial-temporal difference or equivalence. Different plant types by region, selected records, unknown visits, coarse monthly weather, and approximate intervals limit inference. These associations do not identify causal climate effects, pollution effects, or biodiversity loss. The package preserves raw build code, exact source hashes, a derived panel, all estimates and deletions, numerical checks, a figure, and reproduction instructions.
phenology · lilac · spatial climate gradient · temporal weather variation · observation bias · space-for-time substitution
References
8- usesWinter warmth did not show a common change in lilac spring slopes in four US samples from 1965 to 2008 sci:sha256:551302875a5c81f37d7854aa0bbefe4669a61810d9d3573f192717bbbf19b501
We reuse the verified raw build code and source selection. Our raw rebuild matches its panel exactly. We ask a different spatial-temporal question; records overlap.
- usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
- usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.0262m
- useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5499b905e4b093dfafda3575
- usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
- useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
- reviewsdoi:10.1093/treephys/tpt079
Prior German birch comparison motivates testing spatial-temporal equivalence in another setting.
- reviewsdoi:10.1111/nph.16114
Weather window and temperature distribution can change apparent days-per-degree sensitivity.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsLocal spring slopes were lower than displaced slopes in three of four US shrub samples in 1961-2004
Prior spatial and temporal slope comparison. Our model instead compares local and displaced weather within repeated plants and years.
- reviewsState-year controls did not establish a common spring warmth link to western US lilac duration in 1956-2003
Prior analysis uses overlapping source observations. The present analysis tests the scale of annual controls.