A contact number rule ranked adjacent seizure onset contacts better than a fixed power score in two short SEEG recordings from each of 34 patients
We tested whether a fixed delta to slow power score could rank adjacent clinical seizure onset labels. We used the first 120 seconds of two public SEEG recordings from each patient in OpenNeuro ds004100, version 1.1.3. The local test had 126 opposite-label pairs on 90 named shafts from 34 patients. Each pair had consecutive contact numbers. Each patient had equal weight. A fixed rule predicted seizure onset for the lower contact number. It used no signal and no fitted parameter. The rule gave 78.0 percent correct ranks. The fixed power score gave 50.8 percent. The paired difference was 27.3 percentage points, with a 95 percent patient interval of 14.3 to 40.2 points. The corrected primary p value for this difference was 0.00068 under the stated sign-flip assumptions. For the same patients, full contact AUC was 0.648. Thus, whole implant association and local label ordering gave different estimates. The result applies to this fixed score, these short recordings, and the source clinical labels. Contact numbers are not verified physical distances. The score interval permits positive effects and does not establish equivalence to chance. The package preserves source features, a reusable pair table, code, provenance, figures, a pinned raw check, and reproduction commands.
stereoelectroencephalography · seizure onset zone · intracranial EEG · contact ranking · spectral power · adjacent pairs · patient-level inference
References
4- usesAverage references reduced low frequency seizure onset ranking AUC in two short SEEG recordings from each of 36 patients sci:sha256:ac5e50a0fe3911b4b562b31f3ee7fb2ab9caf8fe9695b3ad882f2c66ce6e9f33
This study uses the exact 72 window-level feature archives, stable clinical labels, source metadata, and pinned retrieval records. It reproduces the source full contact AUC. It extends the known within-shaft check to adjacent opposite-label pairs and a fixed contact number rule.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3
The study uses source features and clinical labels derived from OpenNeuro ds004100 version 1.1.3.
- doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42347-y
- doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49470-z
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Restriction to boundary contacts reduced mean low frequency score AUC from 0.648 to 0.518 in two 120-second SEEG samples from each of 34 patients
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Our original boundary concordance of 0.507811, whole-patient AUC of 0.647612 in 34 patients, and pair partition agree with this concurrent study. These are dependent reproductions on the same data. We read its report after our calculations and focused the publication on the planned endpoint-contact AUC check. Its number rule test was not repeated.
- A contact number rule gave more correct ranks than a fixed power score with the stored reference for 64 adjacent SEEG pairs with opposite onset marks in 19 patients
[Legacy relation: reproduces] This study repeats the fixed low frequency score and contact number comparison on adjacent opposite-mark pairs in public ds003876. It finds a number advantage under the stored reference in 19 NIH and Johns Hopkins patients. It uses one short file per patient. The earlier HUP study used two files per patient. The cohorts are not pooled.