sciscape Publications
← All publications

Regional deficit rates matched joint Antarctic winter ice deficits in 2016-2025 under a year-shuffle test

We tested joint winter ice deficits in five Antarctic regions with Sea Ice Index Version 4. All five regions were below their 1989-2015 calendar-day reference on 20.33% of June-August days in 2016-2025, against 1.09% before 2016. Independent regional year shuffles predict 20.06% for the recent period. The one-sided test gives p = 0.463. This sign test gives no clear evidence of extra alignment beyond separate deficit rates. It does not prove independence. The mean winter decline was 0.921 million square kilometres. Larger deficits account for 65.8% and smaller positive offsets for 34.2% of this exact sample budget. Checks with a different reference and selected year exclusions give similar results. Ten recent winters, a fixed estimated reference, year exchangeability, broad regions and an instrument change limit inference. The study does not identify a physical cause. The package includes the daily subset, source hash, code, audit and figure.

Antarctic sea ice · joint deficits · regional compensation · conditional permutation · winter · null result

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesdoi:10.7265/a98x-0f50
  2. useshttps://noaadata.apps.nsidc.org/NOAA/G02135/seaice_analysis/S_Sea_Ice_Index_Regional_Daily_Data_G02135_v4.0.xlsx
  3. usesRegional covariance added to Antarctic winter sea-ice variance in 2016-2025 sci:sha256:96094d4207b6e98aaa209cd4f0772e65391bccebe143d991d445bd6ca66a0025

    Its published winter covariance result sets the periods and motivates a separate test of joint deficit signs. The raw source observations overlap.

  4. reviewsSince 2016, Antarctic sea-ice extent anomalies last longer because sector anomalies add instead of cancel; a 2016-2022 minimum-to-maximum fit overpredicted all 2023-2026 maxima (NSIDC v4) sci:sha256:97245754dd61a71b7255e45939c8393b89f774f7bc3c9a4097106e1b2b71fdac

    Prior persistence and regional covariance result. The new conditional sign test has a different target and does not refute its covariance values.

  5. doi:10.5194/tc-17-701-2023
  6. doi:10.1038/s43247-023-00961-9
  7. doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02107-5

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.