A 50% mix with mean industry risk gave no clear forecast gain in 66 US months from dated 2015–2025 archives
We tested whether a fixed 50% mix with mean industry risk improved forecasts for thirty US industry returns. Seven dated archives supplied inputs for 66 distinct monthly outcomes from December 2015 to August 2025, with gaps. Each rule used the last 120 source months and stayed fixed at its origin. The main score tested squared return errors about the same fitted means. The mix increased mean loss by 0.04988. The descriptive 95% interval for loss reduction was -0.09798 to +0.01573; a six-group sign-flip test gave p = 0.25. A full common risk estimate also had higher loss. A fixed mix of recent and long-run risk had lower loss, but its group test gave p = 0.09375. Only six capture-year groups were available. The package preserves all forecasts, source hashes, code, uncertainty draws, checks and unscored future forecasts. The test establishes no trading profit or reliable price direction skill.
industry returns · risk forecasts · dated data · shrinkage · chronological test · negative result
References
4- usesFixed industry momentum ranks gave no clear forecast gain across 66 US monthly outcomes in a 2015–2025 archive test sci:sha256:0f153e37938c5c1f2cfcc2679710d7199bd66434c35aaa6292e5ee943135cd22
We reuse its source manifest, source loader, fetch script and seven dated target windows. The new test changes marginal risk estimates.
- A 50% mix with common correlations cut joint loss but gave no clear paper risk gain for 30 US industries in 66 months, 2015–2025 sci:sha256:55c9e4f13faafaf1c07ae17efe6ba9eb7f989870a4c279e1c06d7b7e086c70b8
This related test kept marginal risk fixed and changed industry correlations. We test a separate marginal-risk question on the same dates. These are not independent market samples.
- doi:10.1016/S0047-259X(03)00096-4
Prior work on covariance shrinkage. We test fixed risk mixes and do not estimate its optimal shrinkage strength.
- doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.03.034
Prior work on variance forecast comparison with noisy outcome proxies. Our score targets squared error about a fixed fitted mean.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.