Maximum-error selection increased later worst-pair error in five-pulse SEEG maps from six epilepsy sessions
We tested two rules that select a stimulation response map from five early SEEG pulses. The rules used the same model choices. One rule used average recording-pair error. The other used maximum recording-pair error. Five later pulses tested each map from 20 to 500 ms. The test used 66 sites in six people with epilepsy. Maximum selection increased later worst-pair error in all six people. The equal-person average increase was 4.35%. The 95% person bootstrap range was 1.63% to 8.28%. Maximum selection also increased average pair error by 12.75%. It selected zero-response maps at 21 sites, compared with 3 sites. The package contains source records, exact voltage products, native examples, code, results, and three figures. This exploratory result applies to one session per person and the tested model choices. It does not establish clinical performance.
SEEG · response prediction · maximum-error selection · stimulation · epilepsy
References
3- usesFive-pulse maps used fewer waveform values without a clear 20–500 ms SEEG error gain over noise scaling in six epilepsy sessions sci:sha256:fc0978446ce6b9f160d6b8cfc5019f3ebb103b238a38c274356bebaa13e0c128
This work supplied the fixed six-session joint voltage products, site maps, source receipts, and mean-error selection method. We reproduced its mean-selection choices and losses before testing maximum-error selection.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
The analyzed sessions and source-derived voltage products use OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1; saved metadata for this exact version records CC0.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.