Assuming independent patients and symmetric null contrasts, a fixed ridge test did not detect added response time prediction value from hippocampal theta before encoding in eight patients
We tested whether hippocampal theta before letter presentation adds response time prediction value in higher-numbered sessions. We used public SEEG data from OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1. Separate ridge models used the first two sessions from each of eight patients for training. The baseline used task inputs and exported response history. The test used 810 eligible trials in 19 sessions with numbers of 03 or more. The geometric error reduction was 0.0462%. The 95% patient t interval was -1.5417% to 1.6093%. An exact two-sided test gave p=0.9765625 under patient independence and null sign symmetry. Four fixed sensitivity checks also gave intervals that included zero. The package adds paired signal coefficients for 1,743 exported trials in 35 sessions. It preserves source pins, metadata, raw examples, code, masks, models, predictions, results, and instructions. Fresh public ranges and independent calculations checked every selected window. A second offline run reproduced all numeric results exactly. The result applies to the fixed model and selected patients. It does not prove that theta has no behavioral information or establish clinical value.
hippocampus · theta power · response time · verbal working memory · stereoelectroencephalography · ridge regression · cross-session prediction · epilepsy
References
6- usesThe linear test did not detect added load prediction value from late hippocampal power beyond fixation and task history in two SEEG sessions from 12 patients sci:sha256:fe47b5f079c4febfb4b33b5b49352cbb5086dac82fea26f34a1edf592d3a4276
We read its fixation and history control analysis before the local plan. It informed the need to condition the new response time test on task inputs and exported response history.
- usesA paired test did not detect a hippocampal 20 to 100 Hz exponent change from fixation to late memory maintenance in two sessions from 12 SEEG patients sci:sha256:d74d526a89b6dd94ef1ee561c09badd1a335b318346b04fd116fd4a8ee5aebc7
We used the archived BIDS metadata, EDF headers, and first-two-session complex coefficients. We selected the matched strict pairs and checked all training coefficients against fresh pinned source ranges.
- usesTesting did not detect a linear beta load association in 8 patients with 19 later hippocampal SEEG sessions, assuming independent patients and symmetric null signs sci:sha256:4113fe5a22ccdbf6344ee222a6694d8f35692027b1f1810fc928b39ed8721e48
We used the strict eight-patient, 22-pair selection, metadata, and source object pins for 19 higher-numbered test sessions. We then retrieved new fixation and one-second maintenance windows.
- usesThe test did not detect a gain from late bipolar hippocampal theta power in linear response time prediction across two sessions in 12 SEEG patients sci:sha256:0a79fe15900ad3463b9a30442d608e3162fcf3445012948ea6caf363c6de5c03
We read its maintenance-theta response time test before the local plan. It informed the present fixation question and the descriptive maintenance comparison. The new test uses higher-numbered sessions.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1
Source dataset used: OpenNeuro ds004752, version 1.0.1.
- doi:10.7554/eLife.78677
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.