Shuffled-year series give about 80% of the Blowes-style turnover rate and most of its marine excess in 450 BioTIME 2.0 studies; directional turnover is 0.055 Jtu per decade in old and new studies
Blowes et al. (2019) used BioTIME v1. They reported fast species turnover (about 0.28 Jtu per decade), faster turnover in marine than in terrestrial assemblages, and the most extreme changes in the tropical marine band. We did these tests again in BioTIME 2.0 (April 2025). We compared 221 studies that were in BioTIME v1 with 229 studies that were new in BioTIME 2.0 (out of sample). Assemblages were study x ~100 km2 cells with at least 5 sampled years and sample-based rarefaction (24,991 assemblages). The unit of inference was the study, with a study bootstrap. The Blowes-style rate (slope of Jtu to the first year, first year = 0) reproduced: 0.30 per decade (v1 studies) and 0.25 (new studies). But when we shuffled the year order in each series, the rate was 0.25 and 0.20, about 80% of the observed rate. Simulations confirm that series with no trend give large Blowes-style rates. The directional part (observed minus shuffled) was 0.055 [0.039, 0.072] in v1 studies and 0.056 [0.041, 0.070] in new studies. An all-pairs lag slope gave 0.079 and 0.082. In v1 studies, marine minus terrestrial was +0.236 [0.134, 0.343] for the Blowes-style rate, but +0.217 of this came from the shuffled series. For the directional part it was +0.019 [-0.017, 0.054] (v1) and +0.023 [-0.016, 0.064] (new). With 3 or more years, a small directional marine excess was possible (+0.035 [0.004, 0.067] pooled). We did not find a tropical marine hotspot in any metric (10 and 8 tropical marine studies). Mean log-richness change was zero in both sets. Thus the directional turnover rate is reproducible out of sample, but it is about one fifth of the Blowes-style rate. The marine excess comes mainly from higher year-to-year dissimilarity, which can be real fluctuation or incomplete detection. Limitations: few tropical studies, the two sets differ in taxa, and our grid and study-mean statistics differ from the original Bayesian models.
BioTIME · temporal turnover · Jaccard dissimilarity · replication · out-of-sample test · marine versus terrestrial · latitude · permutation null · biodiversity change · rarefaction
References
10- challengesdoi:10.1126/science.aaw1620
We test its realm and latitude turnover pattern out of sample. The overall rate reproduces, but most of the rate and of the marine excess also occurs in time-shuffled series; no tropical marine hotspot.
- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.15222193
BioTIME 2.0 query and metadata are the data for all analyses.
- usesdoi:10.1111/geb.70003
BioTIME 2.0 data paper.
- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.1211105
BioTIME v1 metadata define which studies were available in 2018.
- doi:10.1111/geb.12729
BioTIME v1 data paper.
- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.3367444
Blowes et al. code; we copied the Jtu-to-first-year metric with the first year set to zero and the latitude bands.
- supportsdoi:10.1126/science.1248484
Our zero mean richness change in old and new BioTIME studies agrees with its result.
- doi:10.1038/s41467-025-68187-1
Related analysis of short-term turnover in BioTIME.
- In BioTIME 2.0, short-term species turnover was lower in the second half of time series, also in 382 new studies and in series that started after 1990; the decrease is not specific to 1975 sci:sha256:91b6e5af934aae8a46701f1edead48e844343c3f87455af1c7795af1ae70e1bb
Related out-of-sample BioTIME 2.0 turnover test with a year-shuffle control, for a different quantity.
- In 8,218 BioTIME 2.0 assemblages, time reversal shows start-year dominant decline is regression to the mean; injected uniform change shifts class contrasts but not Berger–Parker dominance sci:sha256:2285c013ae7f5a0fd2b4ed83ca95f3b8a0e5c88fd4b27f59719630cafecb5f04
Other BioTIME 2.0 analysis; uses time reversal as a control for a different question.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Annual bird community dissimilarity showed no clear rise between 1996–2010 and 2011–2025 on 103 Swedish routes with the same observers
It distinguishes directional replacement from annual dissimilarity. The present test concerns the level of adjacent-year dissimilarity.
- supportsBird lists from the same observer differed more after ten years than after five years on 222 Swedish routes in 1996–2025
This study explains why an imposed zero at the reference year can increase a fitted turnover rate. We compare positive time intervals and do not fit through zero.