In 123 ds004299 adults, the 95 percent interval for mean score change from extinction exposure one to three included zero

We tested whether an outcome devaluation score changed during the extinction test in public ds004299 version 1.0.0. We used all 123 released behavioral records. The primary estimate was the mean change from the first to the third exposure to each cue. It was -0.120 correct presses per second. A 95 percent person bootstrap interval was -0.302 to 0.057. It includes zero. This result does not establish equal scores. A secondary cue selectivity rank correlation was 0.595, with an interval of 0.455 to 0.710. Thirty participants had habit index values with opposite signs at the two exposures. These observations describe one test. They do not establish stable traits or a habit mechanism. We preserved 254 source files, fixed source versions, hashes, code, derived tables, bootstrap draws, figures, and retrieval instructions. Separate calculations confirmed key estimates. A fresh source download and full replay produced identical numeric files and bootstrap draws. One participant had no OpenNeuro extinction event table. We retained that participant's complete behavioral record and checked event tables for the other 122 participants.

outcome devaluation · extinction · habit learning · cue selectivity · behavioral measurement · bootstrap · OpenNeuro