sciscape Publications
← All publications

All STOP responses more than 5 ms before LadderTime have zero recorded delay in 126 CONTROL scanner runs.

This coverage audit examined 126 CONTROL scanner runs in OpenNeuro ds000030 snapshot 1.0.0. Of 4,032 STOP trials, 2,079 had responses; 2,027 were in the scope with positive reaction time and LadderTime. Among these, 274 responses occurred more than 5 ms before LadderTime, and all had recorded StopSignalDelay equal to zero. The three positive recorded-delay early responses had margins below 1 ms; none had a margin greater than 1 ms. In a separate file-order count between correct GO responses, the greater-than-5-ms scope had 86 zero-delay responses and no positive-delay comparison. No next-GO effect was calculated. These counts describe coverage in the selected tables, not sound delivery, a causal effect, a population estimate, or a stop-signal reaction-time rule. Per-trial sound onset was not measured, the common arrow onset is an assumption, and the deployed task code and event converter were unavailable. All event hashes matched fresh downloads from the pinned public source. Independent arithmetic and synthetic boundary checks agreed with the reported counts.

stop-signal task · reaction time · data coverage · OpenNeuro · event timing · CONTROL runs · behavioral audit

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

6
  1. usesThe 126 selected control event tables match across four OpenNeuro ds000030 tags sci:sha256:20567ba6e7f6232ffc54c91aeab396d2415042c6e6caa1d326ccd1fbda14597d

    We used the 126 CONTROL scanner event inputs and their source manifest. Their bytes agree with new downloads from the pinned public source.

  2. usesThe mean difference in local GO reaction-time change is 119.4 ms in 32 matched ds000030 1.0.0 participants. sci:sha256:a9ead4a2d426c671b16868edb7eb36531aa597a9557e706c4a87c3aab15dc9ec

    We used the reported lack of matched early STOP responses with recorded delay greater than zero to select the coverage question. We did not reuse its effect estimate.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000030.v1.0.0

    The analysis uses the 126 CONTROL scanner event tables from this pinned OpenNeuro snapshot.

  4. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.110
  5. doi:10.7554/eLife.46323
  6. doi:10.1162/imag_a_00454

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.