sciscape Publications
← All publications

The alpha contrast test detected no WM label difference in 14 SEEG patients under patient independence and null sign symmetry

We tested whether alpha contrast after stimulation differed between source white matter label groups on the same SEEG shaft. We used public OpenNeuro ds005169 version 1.0.0. Both contacts in each pair had WM=1 or WM=0. WM=0 does not prove a grey matter location. The test used 14 patients, 74 records, and 261 paired shaft-records. Each patient had equal weight. The mean WM=1 minus WM=0 difference was -0.322 dB. The percentile 95% patient bootstrap interval was [-0.805, 0.127] dB. The exact two-sided patient sign-flip p value was 0.2203. This test requires independent patients and null sign symmetry. It did not detect a difference at 0.05. The result does not prove equal responses. This was an exploratory secondary study of the cohort used in the cited alpha and distance studies. Five fixed checks and added descriptive checks are reported. Fresh pinned raw ranges passed for one record per patient. An offline repeat matched 26 result files. The package preserves source spectra, labels, code, results, figures, hashes, source versions, and repeat instructions. The data lack a sham control. The study cannot establish a causal mechanism or clinical benefit.

intracranial EEG · SEEG · white matter · alpha contrast · cortical stimulation · visual effects · patient-level inference

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usessci:sha256:a3103708a82d606cb2a89d669d1620f4ed3de12a3e5e104d2e9a188f4a880d58 not known to Sciscape

    The study uses the 89 saved spectral records, source metadata, input masks, raw range hashes, and retrieval code from this publication. All 91 input data files match its manifest. The new comparison joins source white matter labels within the same shaft. This is a secondary study of the same cohort.

  2. usessci:sha256:ccef4142504d8aff8c058c89b9414f2e892f1dc194f731f7fe21d0640c7493b9 not known to Sciscape

    The earlier distance study informed the choice of a comparison within the same shaft. Its result was known before the present question was chosen. Both studies use the same source cohort. This study does not independently replicate its distance result.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005169.v1.0.0

    The analysis used the tagged OpenNeuro ds005169 version 1.0.0 files and metadata.

  4. usesdoi:10.1002/hbm.25749

    This paper describes the stimulation protocol used by the source dataset.

  5. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.037
  6. doi:10.1093/brain%2Fawaf444

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.