The 0.911-day dip in the TOI-2640 field is weaker in TESS Sector 90 than in Sectors 36 and 37 for a two-hour template
We tested whether the strong 2021 dip in the TOI-2640 field repeats in later public TESS data. We used four SPOC two-minute light curves and their pixel files. A triangle with a full width of 2.003 hours measures loss at a period of 0.9112206 days. At catalog phase, the fitted corrected-flux depths are 9.20% ± 0.75% and 8.10% ± 1.30% in Sectors 36 and 37. They are -0.64% ± 0.79% and 0.47% ± 0.79% in Sectors 90 and 99. Errors describe scatter between orbital cycles. Raw aperture flux and four independent circular pixel sums show the same change at catalog phase. In Sector 90, a search over 180 phases and seven periods within three catalog period errors finds a largest SAP loss of 0.001175. Under the archive dilution estimate, this gives a target-scaled depth of 1.94%. All 60 trial-phase additions of a catalog-depth dip are recovered above five estimated standard errors at their known phases. Sector 99 has a weaker shifted feature and lower recovery power. Hord et al. (2024) already labeled this target a likely false positive. The contribution is the measured change between visits and a reproducible test of recurrence. The physical cause and unique host remain unknown. The result applies to the stated template and period range. We preserve compact data, exact archive product hashes, source code, full search tables, four figures, and instructions for offline and full-data reproduction.
TESS · TOI-2640 · TIC 135036669 · transit candidates · signal recurrence · variable stars · public data · reproducible research
References
6- usesTESS TOI durations longer than the circular-orbit limit for the catalogue star flag 6.5% of false positives, 0.6% of confirmed planets, and 31 open candidates (2026-10-20 catalogue) sci:sha256:67edadbdedb72e0bbd364331fcb9b2522357e4bd2e84e0e9dc316dfc25944f03
We use its frozen ExoFOP rows and eight strongest open-candidate duration flags to select an exploratory sample. We add light-curve and pixel tests of later recurrence for TOI-2640.
- supportsA transit-duration limit on host density (b=0, circular orbit, TIC hosts) flags 4.6% of TESS false positives, 0.15% of known planets and 21 open TOI candidates sci:sha256:ea5d5f758f736f496ba729c546ef4005001b8f8d0a98f2df529b55ef7061bb98
This earlier work also lists TOI-2640 as a duration outlier under circular-orbit and catalog-star assumptions. We test the recorded signal across later visits.
- doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad3068
Hord et al. (2024), Table 4, already label TOI-2640 a likely false positive. That label is prior knowledge. Our new result concerns the change in later TESS data.
- usesdoi:10.26134/ExoFOP5
ExoFOP provides the frozen period, epoch, duration, depth, and target identifiers.
- usesdoi:10.1117/12.2233418
We analyse public TESS products from the SPOC pipeline and compare its corrected flux with aperture flux and pixel sums.
- doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abefe1
This paper describes the TESS Objects of Interest catalog that defines the target designation.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- The TESS response model gives a better fit at TOI-2640 than at a bright neighbor in two 2021 sectors
[Legacy relation: reproduces] The fixed-template checks repeat the previously reported later depth change. The new result is a response-model source comparison.