sciscape Publications
← All publications

Oklahoma earthquake rates in 2019-2026 fell faster than injection-pressure forecasts made in 2018; lower injection explains little of the error, and rates stay 4-18 times above the 1980-2008 level

Question: did the decline of injection-induced earthquakes in Oklahoma after the 2015 peak follow injection-driven forecasts, and is the rate back at the pre-2009 level? Approach: we compared the published Langenbruch, Weingarten and Zoback (2018) forecast with ComCat counts, and we ran honest out-of-sample tests of 24 simple pressure-model variants (2-D diffusion from reported Arbuckle injection of 814 wells; memoryless, maximum-pressure (Kaiser), delayed, non-linear and depleting responses) against exponential and power-law decay baselines, for four calibration end dates and three magnitude thresholds (OGS catalog, 0.2-degree cells, monthly). Results: observed M>=3 counts were 181, 57 and 34 in 2018-2020 against the published 190, 130 and 100. Reported injection was 10% and 30% below the assumed rate in 2019 and 2020, but in our models this lowers the forecast by only 7-14%, while observed M>=2.5 counts were 20-28% of the forecast. For forecasts from 2017, 2018 and mid-2019, decay of the recent rate beat the selected pressure model in every forecast year. For a forecast from January 2021, a strongly non-linear, depleting pressure model beat both decay baselines in all 6 years at M>=2.5 and M>=3, but its forecast hardly depends on post-2018 injection (2.6%). In 2021-2025 the M>=2.5 rate (31-125 per year) was still 4-18 times the 1980-2008 rate (7.1 per year). The residual events occur in cells that were active in 2014-2016; their link to current local injection is uncertain (slope -0.01 to 0.40, all 95% upper bounds below 1). Limitations: the pressure model is 2-D and Oklahoma-only; the LWZ study polygon and forecast uncertainty are not available; OGS magnitudes mix ML and copied Mw for larger events; plug-backs cannot be tested with OCC depth fields.

induced seismicity · Oklahoma · wastewater injection · Arbuckle Group · earthquake forecasting · forecast verification · pore pressure diffusion · Kaiser effect · seismicity decay · seismogenic index

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

9
  1. challengesdoi:10.1038/s41467-018-06167-4

    We compare its published 2018-2020 M>=3 forecast with observed counts; 2019-2020 counts were 40% of the forecast.

  2. challengesdoi:10.1126/sciadv.1601542

    Earlier forecast that the rate would approach historic levels within a few years.

  3. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2025.119677

    Coulomb threshold rate-and-state model of Oklahoma and Kansas seismicity to 2024.

  4. doi:10.1029/2018WR023587

    Models of seismicity response to injection-rate reduction.

  5. usesdoi:10.1785/0220190211

    OGS statewide network and catalog.

  6. https://www.seismosoc.org/news/plugged-wells-and-reduced-injection-lower-induced-earthquake-rates-in-oklahoma/

    Plug-back explanation of the decline (Skoumal et al. 2024).

  7. useshttps://oklahoma.gov/occ/divisions/oil-gas/oil-gas-data.html

    OCC Form 1012A UIC injection volumes 2006-2025.

  8. useshttps://ogsweb.ou.edu/eq_catalog/

    OGS earthquake catalog download, 2026-11-08.

  9. useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/

    USGS ComCat event service, 2026-11-08.

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.