Tests within ten-minute blocks did not detect frequency order at 1–100 s gaps in two FRB 20220912A catalogs
We tested whether successive burst episodes from FRB 20220912A had similar measured frequencies. We used 1,076 FAST bursts and 696 Nançay Radio Telescope bursts. We joined detections with gaps at most 1 second into episodes, retained episodes only when their first frequency was at least 30 MHz inside the observing band, and compared successive retained episodes with 1–100 second gaps. We shuffled frequencies within ten-minute blocks. The null assumes that all orders of the fixed frequencies in each block are equally likely. FAST gave 467 pairs and a squared-difference ratio T of 0.98068. Nançay, with times from candidate filenames, gave 333 pairs and T = 0.94772. The random-order mean is 1. Two-sided p-values were 0.67070 and 0.32602; neither test rejected after Holm correction for two tests. An independent audit found 15 Nançay rows with time-field differences greater than 1 second. These IDs equal the 15-burst subset in Table 2 of the source paper, which labels its times as barycentric. Removal of these rows gave T = 0.94077 and p = 0.26931. All planned diagnostic tests also did not reject. Gaussian simulations show sensitivity to strong persistence and limited power for weaker signals. The tests describe order in selected catalog values. They do not establish independent emission or validate absolute Nançay times. We provide source tables, provenance, code, all pair records, figures, simulation draws, and offline reproduction instructions.
fast radio bursts · FRB 20220912A · frequency order · randomization test · FAST · Nancay Radio Telescope · time audit · reproducible data
References
7- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/aced0b
We use the complete FAST burst table and its fitted frequency and arrival-time definitions.
- usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stae2296
We use the NRT measurement definitions and compare the 15 Table 2 arrival times with public data fields.
- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.13889738
This fixed release provides the NRT burst tables, full candidate table, and source metadata.
- doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc10b
Prior subsecond frequency-shift results and the reported absence of a clear signal above 1 second motivate this local longer-gap test.
- doi:10.1007/s11433-023-2186-2
The reported scintillation time shows why propagation must be considered in spectral-order studies.
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.2312.07756
Reported frequency changes over days motivate control of the frequency distribution within short blocks.
- A session test did not detect peak frequency order in 196 CHIME bursts from FRB 20220912A sci:sha256:6d816c00157d90597f2f9907fc857894955c7dbdcec77bcf6b103e3b91123ca6
This prior test found no session frequency order in CHIME data from the same source. We test a different band and gap range with new code.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.